Showing posts with label Paul Celan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Paul Celan. Show all posts

Saturday

The Zone & the Plateau (2014)



Murray Edmond, ed.: Ka Mate Ka Ora


Paul Celan & Leicester Kyle:
The Zone & the Plateau



Paul Celan (1938)

1 – Airlifting Paul Celan

Perhaps the greatest risk for the reading of Celan in our time is that we have venerated him … crippling exceptionalism has made his work a symbol of his fate rather than an active matrix for an ongoing poetic practice.
– Charles Bernstein (2004)

Charles Bernstein’s remark, above, inspires one to ask precisely how Paul Celan’s work can be made the “active matrix for an ongoing poetic practice” – by which I presume Bernstein means to imply a practice aware of and responsive to contemporary historical and political events and ideologies?

  • One such application of his work might be on the biographical or personal level:

    In her launch speech for my book Celanie: Poems & Drawings after Paul Celan (2012), New Zealand poet Michele Leggott talked of the idea of “airlifting” material from one cultural matrix into another – in this case, a kind of Berlin airlift of German poems by a Central European writer, attached, with extensive annotations, to the letters he wrote to his Francophone wife, and subsequently transplanted (by me) into Antipodean English.

    Leggott justified this procedure in terms of the human identification we can all feel with the tragic love-story of Paul and his wife, artist Gisèle Celan-Lestrange:
    Small masterpieces of language hooked up to lives … this is what I’m hearing in Jack's rendition of the poems in the letters written to Gisèle Celan-Lestrange. (Leggott)

    This essentially emotional reading of my book of translations from Celan’s German (via French) is strengthened by the presence, in Celanie, of a series of intensely expressive artworks by another artist, Aucklander Emma Smith, each focussing on a different view of a flayed horse’s skull.

  • Then, of course, there are the more characteristically technical aspects of Celan’s writing: his idiosyncratic neologisms and deliberately broken syntax:

    In a recent review of expatriate Māori poet Vaughan Rapatahana, critic Scott Hamilton cited Celanie as evidence for his contention that these aspects of Celan’s work offer an ideal model for the literary consequences of Rapatahana’s own hostility towards the English language, and his anxiety at retaining it as his principal medium of expression, despite its inevitable colonial overtones:
    The famous obscurity of Celan's poems comes partly from his mistrust of the language in which they were written. Celan had a fuming desire to write ... At the same time, he feared that by setting down words and lines and stanzas in a contaminated language he was falsifying or dishonouring his experiences, and the experiences of his people. Celan was like a man lost in a desert who came across a pool of filthy water. He had to drink, but feared that the deep, desperate draughts he took might kill him. To read the poems in Celanie, with their gnomic images, oxymoronic maxims, strange neologisms, and dizzyingly sudden line-breaks, is to see Celan both slaking his thirst and sickening himself. (Hamilton)

  • While not wishing to dispute (or supplant) either of these interpretations, I’d like in this essay to suggest a third, environmental or eco-poetic approach to using Celan’s work as the “active matrix for an ongoing poetic practice.”

    The key lies in the word “Celanie,” which Emma and I chose for our title after discovering it in the introduction to the French edition of Paul and Gisèle’s collected correspondence. The editor, Bertrand Badiou, explains the term as follows:
    Reading these letters doubled with poems is also to delimit the space where Celan habitually deployed his language, and which he referred to – not entirely seriously – as his “Celanie”: the Rue des Ecoles, the Rue de Lota, the Rue de Montevideo, the Rue de Longchamp, the Rue d’Ulm, the Rue Cabanis …, the Rue Tournefort and Avenue Emile Zola. Around this space exists another one, not much larger, which included the towns of Moisville, Epinay-sur-Seine, Le Vésinet, Suresnes and Epinay-sur-Orge. Celan chose to include almost all of these place-names on the manuscripts of his poems, like guarantees on their first dated and “unalterable” versions, as well as on quite a number of his own annotated books, thus – in a sense – annexing them to the world of his writing. (Badiou & Celan, 2:10)[1]

    While I was careful to quote this passage in the introduction to our book, I neglected to unpack many of its implications there beyond saying that we liked “to think of these images, accompanied by English versions from his German-French dual-text poems, as a kind of ‘Celanie’ – our own take on that particular region of the imagination which can only be accessed through Celan’s strange, bleak, wintry words.” I concluded by saying that we hoped to inspire others:
    to put on record their own “Celanie”: their own individual understandings of the world of one of our age’s most individual and troubling poets. (Ross & Smith, 15)


I’m not sure, now, that that’s an adequate way to characterise Celan’s own usage “non sans humour” [not without humour] of the word “Celanie.” For him, it was clearly more of a place of refuge from the cold inhuman landscapes of his imagination, of the history he had himself experienced, than one of the actual provinces of that poetry.

Perhaps it was not even a place of refuge: an eyrie, rather – a place of power, of sustenance, which he could return to after his excursions, short or long, into that inimical world of the death-camp and the bureaucracies of terror.

Take, for example, the very last poem he sent Gisèle (in a letter dated 18 March 1970, a scant month before his death): “Es wird etwas sein, später
There

will be something, later,
that fills itself with you
and lifts itself
to a mouth

From my shattered
mind
I stand up
and watch my hand
tracing the one
unique
circle [2]

Is it wrong to see this traced “Kreis” [circle], familiar from magic and necromancy, as somehow related to the “l'espace” [the space] of Parisian streets he frequented, the little quartier that gave him a base, a place to stand, encircled as it was (in its turn) by the little towns he had visited and stayed in so often with Gisèle and their son Eric?

In a much earlier poem, “Plage du Toulinguet”, dated Autumn 1954, Celan wrote:
The Beach at Toulinguet

What we saw is coming now
to say goodbye to you and me:
the sea, which tossed our nights on shore
the sand, which kept them by our sides
the rust-red heather above
in which the world happened to us [3]

The equation here between the emotional comfort given by Gisèle (at this early stage in their relationship, at any rate) and an essentially anthropomorphic view of natural phenomena is explicit. Pathetic fallacy or not, Celan’s imagery seemed firmly grounded – at that point – in the romantic sexual iconography of sea and shore.

The tone of these topographical descriptions grows more desperate and frenzied later, culminating in his famous image, in the late sequence “Black Toll” [Schwarzmaut], which Gisele illustrated for him, of “the remnants of hearing and sight / in Dormitory 1001,” where:
daily all night
the bears polka [4]

Is that a better way to think of a “Celanie,” then: as a littoral, a zone, the place where opposites meet? In Tarkovsky’s 1979 film Stalker, when the Writer, the Professor and their guide, Stalker, finally enter the Zona [Zone] which the aliens once visited, then abandoned, leaving behind the remains of their “Roadside Picnic” (the title of the Strugatsky novel the film was based on), the filmstock shifts from black and white to colour.

The emotional truth of the film, one should note, however, lies in the return of these three to their real world of responsibilities: to the crippled child of Stalker, above all, who has been waiting patiently with her mother for the idealist’s return.

There’s an undoubted excitement, momentousness, in the vertiginous dangers of the Zone. In the end, though, none of the three is prepared to enter the final chamber where wishes can (allegedly) come true: Stalker because he sees the truth of his role solely in acting as a guide to others; the Writer because he is, essentially, an observer rather than an actor; the Professor because he has finally rejected his and his colleagues’ plan to destroy this “unscientific” haven of false hopes.

Similarly, for Celan, neither domesticity nor the extremes of memory (not to mention the constant reminders of entrenched Nazism and anti-Semitism in his trips to and fro to his only true “audience” in Germany) could ever finally satisfy him. It was in the alternation between them that he found his semblance of balance, of normality – the balance asserted again and again in the poems he sent back from this “front” in letters to his wife:
The bright

stones go up in the air
clear, white, light-
shards

They don’t want
to fall back, touch,
hit
They go up
blossoming
like wild flowers
then, closing, fall
on you
my light
my truth

I look at you
you take them from my hands
you put them back into
the light, which no-one needs
to own or name
(Ross & Smith, 33)[5]

Those of us to whom history has had somewhat gentler lessons to impart might still be able to benefit in various ways from this poetic enactment of the fort-da game. Perhaps, as Freud conjectured, this childish throwing out and pulling back of a toy does represent an underlying pattern which speaks to other activities: not so much a warding-off as an acknowledgment of our powerlessness before death.

In any case, I think it must be in this sense that we take Celan as our guide into the Zone, avoiding the “crippling exceptionalism” of Holocaust-guilt which renders his experiences in the Second World War and afterwards as literally unimaginable to those of us who come after.

The word Kreis which I quoted above, the magic circle Celan hoped in his very last poems to trace around himself and Gisèle, inevitably recalls Bert Brecht – and his various collaborators’[6]Kaukasische Kreidekreis [Caucasian chalk circle], In Brecht’s play, however, the chalk circle is a place of judgement, where the true, biological mother proves less devoted to her own child than the servant girl who saved him, and who has raised him as her own. Unconditional love proves stronger than natural maternal instincts, in a direct inversion of the “Judgement of Solomon” motif so familiar from folklore.



Leicester Kyle (2000)

2 – The Poetics of the Denniston Plateau

In May 2013, Nick Smith, the Minister for Conservation, announced his approval of Australian company Bathurst Resources’ bid to strip-mine a large tract of the Buller Plateaux, on the upper West Coast of New Zealand’s South Island, for coal:
He said the area was not a National Park or a Conservation Park and did not have any particular reserve status.
"It is general stewardship land, which is the lowest legal status of protection of land managed by the Department of Conservation.” (Bradley)

A few days later it was revealed that not only had Smith ignored the advice of environmental networks, but also that of the officials in his own Department in making this decision (Lunn). Despite a partially successful appeal to the High Court by environmental group Forest and Bird, the latest news from the Supreme Court (19/9/13) confirms that Smith’s original decision will be upheld.

But what has any of that got to do with poetry, or (for that matter) with Paul Celan, the subject of the first section of this essay?

I suppose that my own involvement with the struggle to preserve the unique eco-system of this region of New Zealand comes courtesy of my friendship with another, somewhat gentler poet, Leicester Kyle (1937-2006), some twenty years younger than Paul Celan (1920-1970) – brought up on the Coast, but born in what seemed (until recently) the much stabler flatland landscape of Christchurch on the Canterbury Plains.

In a reflection piece on the proposed mining of the Denniston Plateau in New Zealand Geographic magazine, Editor-at–large Kennedy Warne remarked:
… for me, standing on the escarpment, it is Kyle who catches the breath of this place and warns of the impending silence – just as he did for Happy Valley, the contentious Solid Energy mining site near Stockton. In his lament for that landscape, he spoke of the birds, writing poignantly: “they have no song for apocalypse”.

He continues:
To what extent, I wonder, did John Hanlon’s song “Damn the Dam”, which topped the singles chart for 1973, help tip the balance against the raising of Lake Manapouri? Did Grahame Sydney’s paintings and Brian Turner’s poems celebrating Central Otago landscapes influence public perception of a wind farm proposal for the Lammermoor Range? [NZ Geographic 122 (July-August, 2013): 114].

He speculates, finally: “Isn’t a listing in Schedule 4 – the statutory register of the country’s most valuable conservation land – the highest protection our environment can have? In one sense, yes. But statutes change, reflecting shifts in social priorities. Perhaps a shared cultural esteem offers a more resilient protection than laws ever can.” This is indeed (as he puts it) “an intriguing thought.”

As one of Leicester Kyle’s two literary executors, and the person mainly responsible for making his collected works – protest poetry and more lyrical works alike – available on the Internet, it’s a thought which has had quite an influence on my actions over the past few years.

Beyond Kennedy Warne’s two articles in NZ Geographic – the one I’ve just quoted from, and a longer piece, “The Black and the Green” [issue 116 (July-August, 2012): 48-79] – is there any evidence that works such as Leicester’s The Great Buller Coal Plateaux (2001) are having any real effect on our attitudes now, seven years after his death from cancer in 2006?

Perhaps that’s the wrong way to consider this issue, though. Perhaps (instead) I should go back a few years and fill in more of the background, explain how Leicester – not yet a familiar name to many poetry readers outside these islands –came to write these works in the first place.

Born in Christchurch in 1937, at the height of the Great Depression, Leicester Kyle grew up in Sumner (among other places), before the family moved into one of the first streets of State Houses built by the Labour government, as he chronicles in his long autobiographical poem State Houses (1997). His father, a journalist with some literary ambitions (he worked with Allen Curnow on the Christchurch Press) came from a well-established Greymouth family, but found it difficult to adjust to life in the city. He committed suicide when Leicester was still in his teens. His wife, Leicester’s mother, killed herself soon afterwards, an experience recorded in his posthumously published collection The God Poems (written c.2005).

Leicester himself started off as an apprentice in the Christchurch Botanical Gardens – as he records in his poem Anogramma (2005) – before joining the Anglican church in 1963, at the age of 26. He worked as a vicar in a number of parishes through New Zealand (and even, for a time, in the North of England), and it was during this period that he first made the acquaintance of a group of painters and writers then living on Banks Peninsula (Jeffrey Harris and Joanna Paul among them), as he explains in his prose memoir “Peninsula Days.”

In a CV written in 2000, he remarks that he “remained in this work until retirement at the age of 60, on the illness of my wife”, then goes on to say that “After the death of my wife I moved from Auckland to Buller, the better to continue my interest in botany, and to write.”
During my life I have written a great deal, though always against the demands of my occupation. I have had articles, short stories, and poems published in many places, including London Magazine, the N.Z. Listener, the Ch.Ch. Press, Poetry NZ., Sport, Takahe, Printout, Pander, and the journal of experimental poetry – A Brief Description of the Whole World ...

I first met Leicester and his wife Miriel Kyle in 1997, at a meeting of the Bookshop poets in Devonport. He became a kind of mentor, in fact, and after Miriel’s death in March 1998, we instituted an informal conversation club at the London Bar on Wellesley Street. We continued to correspond after his departure for the West Coast in mid 1998, and I visited him there three times: in 1998, 2000, and 2002.

The town he was living in, Millerton, in the hills above Granity, up the coast from Westport, was very close to the Stockton mine, and so Solid Energy’s plans to stripmine the plateau above his home hit him hard.

As he himself put it in the late essay “Orchids in a Ghost Town”:
In part, I came here for the botany, and botany has brought me here since I was fourteen. My father started me on this course when I was old enough to go with him. He was a keen naturalist and a conservator and would take me with him on his rambles. Though born on the West Coast, of gold-rush stock, he then lived on the Port Hills above Christchurch, and that was the first environment I came to know. Laing & Blackwell was my manual, and amongst the very first plants which I identified by myself were two orchids—Earina autumnalis and Thelymitra longifolia.

To Leicester, the pakihi, the somewhat unspectacular moorland landscapes of the Buller Plateau region, was a treasure trove of hidden botanical marvels: a series of valleys and ridges untouched since the last Ice Age, unique in the world. The idea of mining it into extinction therefore spurred him into action:
Respect the plants which grow on these cliffs. They mightn’t look much, but they’ve been attracting scientific attention since the 1890’s, when they were noted by Buller’s first resident botanist, W. Townson.
There are two plants here which grow nowhere else in the country: a gentian, and a mountain daisy (celmisia). …
These plants have found a carefully-balanced life in adverse conditions which are often extreme, so take the best care you can not to disturb them.

After helping to found MAPPS [The Millerton and Plateau Protection Society] in 2000, Leicester, as president of the organization, had a number of meetings with Don Elder, the CEO of Solid Energy, and negotiated the formation of the Millerton Heritage Park, of which Leicester acted as unofficial curator, in 2003.

His greatest coup during this period, however, was the discovery of the giant Millerton snail, Powelliphanta millertonii. Leicester gives a somewhat flippant account of this in his poem “Our New Snail”:
Trish found it,
crossing the road —
the snail, that is.

She was going for a walk
to calm herself,
for there was trouble with the plumbing, again.
It was early,
and had been raining.

I had told her:
‘If you see a snail shell
please bring it to me,’
for I’m interested,
so she brought me the creature,
‘At least you’ll have the shell,’ she said,
but it was too important to keep.

I could see it was an entity
so I rang Kath Walker in town.
‘Measure it,’ she said,
‘and describe it to me,’
but how to do that —

it’s so old
it’s out of my authority;
exactness is absurdity
with a thing like this,
and words are gauche.
It antedates statistics by an aeon.
Chromosomes and categories
slip off down its trail.

‘Look’, I said,
‘It’s uncomfortable.
I’ll ring you back.’

‘Give it a worm,’
she told me.
‘They suck them in
like spaghetti.’

In a 2004 postscript to his 2003 report to MAPPS on the formation of the Millerton Heritage Park, he strikes a more somber tone. I’d like to quote his words in full:

The discovery in 2003 of the Millerton snail—Powelliphanta lignaria ‘Millertonii’—is an illustration of a considerable difficulty we face in our environment.
For over a century this snail had lived in a human community and not been noticed sufficiently to come to the attention of science. It’s a quite large solidly made bush snail that lives in several acres of forest and scrub. A road goes through its territory, two rail tracks have done so, and there’s a house on it. Some fifteen years ago a bush fire narrowly missed the land. In the spring the snail gets restless and goes wandering around the house and across the road; at other times it’s not seen.
During the century of co-habitation with humans it could so easily have been eradicated by such things as fire, industry, or property development—part of its land is designated on the town plan for road and housing. Had any such accident happened, we would never have come to know the animal.
You might well ask whether that would matter, and go on to attend to some other issue more important than a vanished snail, but before you do—stop and think: how different our country would be if the moa, tuatara, takahe, huia, eagle--and the many others of our great army of the disappeared--were still around; how much more lively would be the mountains and the bush. And then there is the colour that has gone—the kaka beak that used to brighten the shores of the Bay of Islands, the scarlet mistletoe that used to make such a brilliant display at Christmas in the Lewis Pass.
These things have gone, and left our island world, our inheritance, so very much the poorer, darker, less interesting. There are few now alive who can remember how rich was the bush before the deer and opossums got into it. This process of impoverishment is continuing, and is of course a global calamity, but here it can be lessened.
One of its causes is ignorance. Our attachment to our natural inheritance is too slender. In all other countries there are poems stories songs and legends about their plants and animals, but here, apart from the Maori, there are virtually none. Our attitudes to our plants and animals is more of sentiment than of experience or knowledge.
We are easily dispossessed of what we value lightly.
We might well be like those who dream on in life, and then awake in a time of need to find they have no friends or family.

Leicester Kyle died of cancer in Christchurch hospital on July 4th, 2006, leaving behind him a considerable legacy of poetic work, published and unpublished. On his deathbed, he asked my friend David Howard and me to act as his literary executors.

As a result of this, in 2011 we began the publication of Leicester’s collected works online, an enterprise which is now substantially complete, and has already inspired two posthumous book publications.

There’s a more ominous side to his legacy, though. You recall his words, quoted above, about the fragility of the giant snail’s tenure of its environment? For a while its mere presence in the hills above Millerton was enough to halt Solid Energy’s plans.

Then, after a couple of years of sparring with various government agencies, they offered to collect the snails by hand, individually, and transport them to an equally hospitable environment further south.

And so they did. We were treated to film, on national TV, of anoraked workers crawling on hands and knees through the sparse undergrowth of the plateau, plucking each of these huge, grotesque snails from their native soil. It was hard to know if this was a triumph or a tragedy for ecologists everywhere.

Until, a few years later (in 2011), we heard that a laboratory worker had accidentally neglected to monitor the temperatures in the storeroom the snails had been stored in temporarily, and that almost a thousand of them had died as a result. The Department of Conservation’s West Coast manager put an upbeat spin on the disaster: “Fortunately we've already managed to relocate more than 60 per cent of the original population into new habitats and we still have more than 800 unaffected snails in the other cool rooms and environmental chambers” (Westport News, 2011).

As Leicester himself put it: “We are easily dispossessed of what we value lightly. We might well be like those who dream on in life, and then awake in a time of need to find they have no friends or family.”

All of which brings me around again to the original question posed by Kennedy Warne in his NZ Geographic editorial: Can “a shared cultural esteem” offer a “more resilient protection” than the law?

Leicester’s initial successes through negotiation with Don Elder: the formation of the Millerton Heritage Park, the (temporary) halt in proceedings caused by the discovery of that rare snail, have now all been negated by the patience and determination of a large energy corporation.

The poetry he wrote about that struggle, The Great Buller Coal Plateaux (2001); not to mention the long sequence “Death of a Landscape” which he published in brief 31 (2004); or “Happy Valley: A Lament for a landscape about to be mined” (2003), which I included in an online feature on NZ poetry on the American poetics site Jacket2 (2011); or his prose notes on the flora and fauna of the Millerton Heritage park (also available online) do, however, continue to exert an influence.

The particular battle he fought may have been lost, but the war to preserve at least a little of our irreplaceable natural heritage goes on. There’s an interesting poem about the nature of his communications with the power company in his 2004 book Living at a Bad Address. He prefaced it with the following note: “Earlier in the year Solid Energy wanted a publicity photo of me with its C.E.O. Don Elder, and I was asked to meet him after a staff meeting. A delay meant that I had to wait outside with his miners and mine-workers, many of whom regard me as a radical greeney trouble-maker.”
Waiting For The C.E.O.

He’s been delayed —
there’s trouble down south;
at Spring Creek there are questions,
so we wait,
I in my truck,
the miners at the car park over the road
where they lounge in their overalls
against the bonnets of their utes,
trying to make point to this pointless time,
talking small to pass it.

They’re here for his presentation:
‘Earning Our Right to Mine’.

‘Mining is a temporary use of the land,
but a permanent use of non-renewable resources’.
they’re to be told,
before they excavate.

I’m here to be photographed with him,
I, who have written to the paper,
the government,
protested in the streets,
who have threatened their jobs,
they say;
I’m to be photographed with their boss.

We’re both uneasy,
I at their resentment,
they at my threat,
but in this we are one:
there’s the road between us
and we long to move on,
each to our work:
theirs at the mine,
mine at the inexpressible.



West Coast Rain (2005)

3 - Conclusion

A few months before his death in 2006, Leicester Kyle wrote a series of poems about rain. The significance of this sequence at first eluded me when I looked through the boxfiles where he’d stacked all the completed poems he wished to preserve. It wasn’t, in fact, until I examined the files stored on his computer hard-disk that I came to understand that they were a sequence, rather than just a series of discrete poems. Rain is, after all, perhaps the dominant fact about life on the Coast.
Night rain
sends a shadow
into late afternoon

the sun doesn’t set

a veil spreads eastwards
white at the edge
but darkening
over a steel sea

lower clouds bank
at the horizon

there’s no wind and
a few drops of rain fall
as darkness sets

we bring in the wood
and pull the blinds
to make refuge

to pretend
at security
[“Night Rain”][7]

“To pretend /at security.” On the one hand, these lines certainly seem to hint at the precariousness of his own tenure of the land. In a few more weeks he would be forced to leave the tiny hamlet of Millerton[8], in the hills above Granity, just north of Westport, to shift into the Christchurch hospital ward where he died.

It is Millerton which we must, I think, regard as Kyle’s own version of Celan’s “Celanie.” He relocated there from Auckland in 1998, shortly after the death of his first wife Miriel from cancer. The house he moved into had been purchased sight unseen, and he devoted the rest of his life to chronicling the old mining village: its landscapes and people.

“To pretend /at security.” These lines also gesture back to the role he’d played in the conservation struggle to preserve this region: books such as his The Great Buller Coal Plateaux, published by MAPPS [the Millerton and Plateau Protection Society], consciously blending poetry with eco-propaganda:
They took the top off Mt. Frederick for reasons they might not
understand
Not just for coal which there’s so much of
The seam is thick for a wide extent
And it might well be that the reasons for decapitation are as
profound as the coal
Such as the cliffs at the west of the hill
For precipices are a downside to a prospector’s on-view
And might remind the managers of limits to a resource
[“For My Father (from the Blackburn Track)”][9]

In these, and many other poems, he was careful to list the long, beautiful botanical names of the species of flora and fauna which would be displaced – in some cases, threatened with extinction. Millerton may act at times in his poems as a magic circle, but more often it’s more like the chalk circle in the Brecht play: a place where we are tried and found wanting.

Leicester was dead by the time Stockton was stripmined, so he never heard of this crowning indignity to all his efforts to preserve this unique environment, unchanged – he told me, as we walked across it one morning – since the last ice age, an irreplaceable repository of knowledge and beauty which could never be regained or reconstituted once lost. But the portion of it we crossed that day has now been lost. What’s left of the plateaux continues to be eroded by successive mining projects.

Hence, I suppose, my continuing interest in the implications of that last sequence of poems by Leicester – “Flood”[10], for instance:
A gull is beaten to the road
where it cowers until
the hail’s overwhelmed by rain
a downpour at first
then a torrent a burst
still mounting to
a river on the path
a flood on the lawn
to the creek raging
down the hill to the road
flooding through the houses
out to a muddied sea

Hence, too, my belief that the “crippling exceptionalism” which Bernstein detects in previous readings of Celan must now begin to take into account the ways in which his work might speak to the distortions of language used to justify environmental devastation – not just the continuing culture-erasing and ethnic-cleansing policies of repressive governments everywhere.

By reading Leicester Kyle and Paul Celan together, I would contend, we can learn as much about our present crises as about their own historical circumstances, their respective choices of a place to stand. Bernstein goes on, in the quotation I began this essay with, to point out that the consequence of this ongoing “process of removing [Celan] … from his own time and place” is to take him “also from our own poetic horizon.”

Though it might sound somewhat utalitarian, the enduring value of such poets as Celan and Kyle must be their example, not simply the specific experiences they have given such eloquent witness to. Using Paul Celan as the “active matrix for an ongoing poetic practice” (as Bernstein tells us we must) involves setting him to work against the network news, reading him in a thousand alien contexts, relocating him in the stunted dwarf forests of the Buller pakihi as well as the crowded streets of the metropolis.




Works cited:





Notes:

1. Lire ces lettres doublées de poèmes, c'est aussi mesurer l'espace où Celan pratique habituellement sa langue et qu'il appelait parfois, non sans humour, sa «Celanie»: la rue des Ecoles, la rue de Lota, la rue de Montevideo, la rue de Longchamp, la rue d’Ulm, la rue Cabanis …, la rue Tournefort et l’avenue Emile Zola. Autour de cet espace en existe un autre, à peine plus vaste, incluant Moisville, Epinay-sur-Seine, Le Vésinet, Suresnes et Epinay-sur-Orge. Celan a choisi de faire figurer presque tous ces noms de lieu sur les manuscrits de ses poèmes, comme des prolongements de leur premières version datée et «inaltérée», ainsi que sur nombre de ses livres annotés, les annexant de la sorte a son écriture. [Unless otherwise specified, all translations in this essay are by the author].

2. Es wird etwas sein, später,
das füllt sich mit dir
und hebt sich
an einen Mund

Aus dem zerscherbten
Wahn
steh ich auf
und seh meiner Hand zu,
wie sie den einen
einzigen
Kreis zieht

13.XII.69
Avenue Emile Zola
(Celan, 363-64).

3. Versammelt ist, was wir sahen,
zum Abschied von dir und von mir:
das Meer, das uns Nächte an Land warf,
der Sand, der sie mit uns durchflogen,
das rostrote Heideikraut droben,
darin die Welt uns geschah.

[automne 1954]

(Celan, 69).

4. HÖRRESTE, SEHRESTE im
Schlafsaaal eintausendund eins,

tagnächtlich
die Bären-Polka
...
[Paris, 9. 6. 1967]

(Celan, 275).

5. Die hellen
Steine gehn durch der Luft, die hell-
weißen, die Licht-
bringer.

Sie wollen
nicht niedergehen, nicht stürzen,
nicht treffen. Sie gehen
auf,
wie die geringen
Heckenrosen, so tun sie sich auf,
sie schweben
dir zu, du meine Leise,
du meine Wahre –:

ich seh dich, du pflückst sie mit meinen
neuen, meinen
Jedermannshänden, du tust sie
ins Helle, das niemand
zu weinen braucht noch zu nennen.

10.7.1961.
Trébabu
23 Uhr.

(Celan, 147).

6. For further details on the complicated genesis of this play, adapted from Klabund’s 1925 Der Kreidekreis in 1941 principally by Margarete Steffin, then worked on again in 1944 by Brecht and Ruth Berlau, see Fuegi, 445-46.







(14-17/6; 9/9-2/10-13/11/13)

Ka Mate Ka Ora 13 (2014): 54-71.
[Available at: http://www.nzepc.auckland.ac.nz/kmko/13/ka_mate13_ross.asp]

[6003 wds]


Ka Mate Ka Ora 13 (2014)






Monday

Interpreting Paul Celan (2012)







Bronwyn Lloyd, ed.: brief 46 – The Survival Issue (November 2012)

Interpreting Paul Celan


[Paul Celan & Gisèle Celan-Lestrange:
Correspondance, vol. I (2001)]


[Paris, 10. 1. 1968]

Chère Gisèle,

je viens d' écrire un poème fait de mots assez simples – je te l'envoie. J'espère beaucoup qu'il te parlera.
Je pense à toi
Paul
(Badiou, I : 608)

[Dear Gisèle,
I’ve just written a poem made up of quite simple words – I’m sending it to you. I very much hope it will speak to you.
thinking of you
Paul ] [1]

This is letter no. 597 in the 2001 French edition of the collected correspondence of German poet Paul Celan and his wife, artist and engraver Gisèle Celan-Lestrange. Gisèle’s German was poor, so the two always wrote to each other in French: her native tongue, his language of predilection. The poems he attached to his letter were, however, always in German: hence the reference above to this particular example being “made up of quite simple words.”
[Paris,] 14 janvier 1968

Cher Paul,
Je te remercie pour le très beau poème "Was näht?". Je crois que je peux le suivre un peu. Il me semble plein d'espoir et aussi continuer le premier poème de «Atemwende» – je l'aime beaucoup
. (Badiou, I : 611)

[Dear Paul,
Thank you for the very beautiful poem “Was Näht?” [What’s Stitched?]. I think that I can follow it a bit. It seems to me full of hope, and also to carry on from the first poem of Atemwende [Breathturn] – I like it very much.]

This is the opening of letter 598, Gisèle’s reply. Clearly she hadn’t found the words quite as “simple” as Paul had hoped. “I think that I can follow it a bit” is as far as she will go in that respect. She does, however, venture some theories on just why he might have felt moved to send it to her.

The two were estranged at the time. In fact, they had been living separately ever since Paul had made a violent assault on his wife, leading to yet another incarceration in the mental hospital at Sainte-Geneviève-des-Bois. They still shared a son, though: Eric, who would eventually act as the co-editor of his parent’s letters (as well as those addressed to him as a child by his father).

The poem “made up of quite simple words,” and dated, with characteristic precision, «10 janvier 68, huit heutes du soir» [January 10th, 1968 : 8 pm] does indeed begin simply enough:
WAS NÄHT
an dieser Stimme? Woran
näht diese
Stimme
diesseits, jenseits?
(Weidemann, 317)

But what does it mean? On the comparatively infrequent occasions that Celan neglects to include vocabulary notes (often even accompanied by a literal French version of his own poem), the co-editor of the Celan-Lestrange letters, Bertrand Badiou, has supplied his own translation. In this case his version reads as follows:
QU'EST-CE QUI COUD
dans cette voix? Que
coud cette
voix
de ce côté-ci, de l'autre côté?
(I : 610)

This I would translate as:
What is stitched in that voice? What is that voice sewing on this side, on that?

It isn’t included in any of the various recensions of Michael Hamburger’s Selected Poems of Paul Celan, nor in either John Felstiner’s biography or his translation of the poet’s Selected Poems and Prose, so there’s no guidance to be expected from either of these two standard sources.

Pierre Joris, the third in the triumvirate of major translators of Celan into English, in his 2005 Selections, renders it as follows:
WHAT SEWS
at this voice? What
does this
voice
sew
hither, beyond? (Joris, ii, 132)

Ian Fairley, in his complete 2007 translation of Celan’s posthumous book of poems Schneepart [Snow Part] (1971), gives it as:
WHAT KNITS
at this voice? At what
does this voice
knit
on this side and on that? (18)

My own version of the poem differs (slightly) from both. It reads:
What’s stitched

into that voice?
What’s it
sewing
this way
that way?

The precipice swears
by white alone
vomits up
the snow-needle

swallow it

you order the world
that counts as much
as reciting nine names
on your knees

Tumuli Tumuli
you
heap those mounds up
come alive
in a kiss

in the distance
a fin
lights up the bay
cast anchor
your shadow’s
lost in the undergrowth

arrival
survival

a beetle spots you
you face
each other
silk-worms
cocoon you

the great
globe
will let you pass

soon
a leaf transfuses you
sparks
piped through
before you choke

you have the right to one tree
to one day
it notes down your number

a word with all its green
burrows in to plant itself

follow it




As you can see, there’s quite a lot to be said about the various choices I’ve made in rendering the poem. For the moment, though, I’d like to backtrack a little: seven years or so, in fact, to 1960.

Early in 1960, Paul Celan was told that he’d been selected to receive that year’s Georg Büchner prize. It’s hard to convey to non-German-speaking readers just how big a deal this is: at least as important as the Booker Prize, possibly on a level with the Pulitzer. Given the hard times he’d been going through, the lack of any obvious recognition for his work, news of this prize reached Celan like manna from heaven.

Of course he promptly began to doubt his worthiness to receive it. After that had subsided a bit, he began to agonise over the speech the winner traditionally delivers on receipt of the award. It seemed a golden opportunity to sum up his aesthetics once and for all – but how to couch it? in what terms? How to get his message across to a nation he felt so ambivalent about, so alienated from? How, in short, to give a speech that would reject the false impression so many had taken from “Todesfuge” [Death-fugue], his most famous poem, that some kind of reconciliation was in fact possible between the heirs of the Nazi régime and their surviving victims?

The result was “The Meridian.” Much quoted, much discussed – little understood. Not so much because Celan’s ideas on art are particularly esoteric or difficult to understand, but because – in deference to his hosts – he couched them almost entirely in the form of references to the works of Georg Büchner, the writer and dramatist in whose name the prize continues to be awarded.

There was nothing perverse or wilful about this to Celan – it made perfect sense to him and others, especially when one considers the sheer heft of Büchner’s ferocious, radical genius, his unique place in German culture. It does rather have the effect, though (for most English-speaking readers), of explaining one’s ideas in Shakespearean terms to an audience that’s never seen or studied one of his plays.

The “Meridian” speech is included in Rosmarie Waldrop’s very useful edition of Celan’s Collected Prose. There’s also a translation of it in Pierre Joris’s Celan: Selections, and another in John Felstiner’s Selected Poems and Prose. Until last year, though, with the appearance of Joris’s book-length English translation of the 1999 German edition of the complete drafts and materials for the speech, there was no way of knowing just how much energy and time he’d put into preparing this text, how much it apparently mattered to him.

There’s a crucial moment early in the speech, where he’s trying to define just what he means by this “meridian” that guides his sense of art, of poetry. A meridian, I’d remind you, is a line of longitude: either an imaginary circle running through both poles of the earth, or else one inscribed on the celestial sphere from the perspective of an individual observer. It’s by analogy with the latter meaning, I suppose, that “meridian” can be extended to mean “the highest point or state of consciousness and enlightenment achievable by a human” (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/meridian).

Celan gives his own explanation in Büchnerian terms, by citing a particular moment in the play Dantons Tod [Danton’s Death] (1835), about the French revolution:
And here [on the scaffold], where it all comes to an end, in the long moments when Camille [Desmoulins] … dies a theatrical – one is nearly tempted to say: a iambic – death … when all around Camille pathos and sententiousness confirm the triumph of “puppet” and “string,” then Lucile, one who is blind to art, the same Lucile for whom language is something person-like and tangible, is there, once again, with her sudden “Long live the king!” (Joris iii, 3)

It is, I suppose, a moment of intense courage: a courage so strong as to seem almost perverse. It comes out of nowhere in the scene, true – and yet refocuses the whole course of it: suddenly all the rest of that windy “pathos and sententiousness” is shown up for what it is: “iambic.”
After all the words spoken on the rostrum (the scaffold, that is) – what a word!
It is the counterword, it is the word that cuts the “string,” the word that no longer bows down before “the bystanders and old war-horses of history.” It is an act of freedom. It is a step. (Joris iii, 3)

Celan is quick to point out that the effect of Lucile’s statement has nothing to do with politics as such, with her (hitherto unmentioned) loyalty to the old régime.
here – permit me, someone who grew up the with the writings of Peter Kropotkin and Gustav Landauer, to emphasize this – here no monarchy and no to be conserved yesterdays are being paid homage to.
Homage is being paid to the majesty of the absurd as witness for the presence of the human. (Joris iii, 3)

This “word that cuts the ‘string”” of the puppet-show, that witnesses the “presence of the human” stands, I feel sure, for quite a bit more than what Tolkien, in his classic essay “On Fairy Stories,” calls eucatastrophe, that moment of supreme beauty when the tables are turned for the good in a fairy tale or a fantasy. It is, however, unmistakably of that kind. The word, for Celan, somehow embodies a tragic element within “the majesty of the absurd.”

And it’s that element of absurdity, of the life-sized (the “person-like and tangible”), which prevents it from being one of those world-shaking moments of Hegelian change which upset an entire order of being and historical order. That kind of string-pulling, manipulative rhetoric is left, here, to Camille Desmoulins and his adversaries the Jacobins, to Kropotkin and his Communo-anarchists.

At that moment, in that company, Lucile’s word is the meridian: the assertion that there is something that outweighs mere power and expediency: that a seemingly pointless gesture of affirmation can have the moral force of a physical blow, invoke an ethical dimension impervious to time.




Returning to the poem “Was näht,” I think the first thing to note about it is its lack of the element Celan, above, calls “iambic” – that sense of the excessive pomp and dignity of art. The imagery here is more small-scale: even, at times, verging on the absurd.

The sound of a voice (like Lucile’s when she says “God save the King”?) is compared by Celan to a piece of handcraft, of embroidery. (Ian Fairley calls it “knitting,” but the image here does seem rather to be one of sewing, as Pierre Joris makes clear in his own translation). In any case, the whiteness of the cloth being stitched seems to evoke in the poet the “Schneenadel” [snow-needle] of the mountains, rising similarly from their own “Abgründe” [abysses].

Then the poet tells us:
schluck sie [swallow it]

Swallow what? The snow-needle? That would seem the most likely grammatical antecedent. It can’t be the “white,” the “abysses.” It could, however, be that “Stimme” [voice].

In any case, whatever we’re being commanded to swallow, needle or voice (perhaps they come down to much the same thing), the action they’re performing – that sewing, that speaking that’s somehow like sewing – serves to order the world. It’s worth at least as much:
... wie neun Namen,
auf Knien genannt


[... as nine names
recited on your knees]

And now the imagery really goes wild. Where do those “tumuli” [grave-mounds?] come from? The weight of a living tradition (“nine names”) constraining the “Kuß” [kiss]?

All of this can still be read as evocative of a needle rising and falling among the mounds of white embroidery cloth, but given that that was, in its turn, simply a metaphor for the movement of a voice, it’s clear that we’re being drawn very far from the narrowly representational.

The poem now casts anchor in some kind of New World of natural forests and bays, goes ashore to sample the flora and fauna, particularly a “Käfer” [beetle], who
... erkennt dich,
ihr steht euch
bevor,
Raupen
spinnen euch ein


[… recognises you,
you stand off
against each other,
caterpillars
spin their silk around you]

Käfer does mean beetle, but it sounds quite a bit like Kaffir [native], as well. It’s also slang for a young girl – a nice “piece of stuff.” I think that we’re now beginning to see the significance of those earlier words: “Ankunft, / Abkunft,” [arrival / origin] and their relation to the “Tumuli, Tumuli” of stanza 5. Arrival in what the closing passage of Fitzgerald’s Great Gatsby famously calls “a fresh, green breast of the new world” (268) cannot absolve us of our past, those “Raupen” [caterpillars] spinning their silk around us.
die Große
Kugel
gewährt euch den Durchzug


[the Great
Globe
accords you passage]

That’s all very well, you can be granted safe conduct to anywhere, but no matter how far you go, you’ll still find yourself linked somehow to the means of life, the green veins that enable you to survive, to breathe:
es steht dir ein Baum zu, ein Tag,
er entziffert die Zahl,

ein Wort, mit all seinem Grün.
geht in sich, verpflanzt sich.

folg ihm


[you have the right to one tree, to one day,
it deciphers your number,

a word, with all its green.
goes back on itself, plants itself.

follow it]

Celan’s train of thought now tracks back to the voice, the word, that began it all, having moved through its imagery of embroidery, white cloths, white peaks, green bays, caterpillar silk, cocoons, leaves, and trees. “Folg ihm” [follow it], he concludes. But follow what? There’s something a little ominous in that idea of having the right to only one tree, one day, registered to your number, like a concentration-camp scar.

Which brings us again to the word, that miraculous word “mit all seinem Grün” [with all its green]: “God save the king!”, it might be – was, for innocent young Lucile on the scaffold. But what is your word, the word you were born to speak? Your “word that cuts the ‘string’ … that no longer bows down”?
It is an act of freedom. It is a step.

Celan’s poem, then, like the “Meridian” speech, is an enactment of his ideas of existential transcendence. There’s a longing for freedom from the “tumuli” of the ancestors within it, however “living” he acknowledges them still to be.

He wants to escape, sees the impossibility of escape, recoils on his starting-place – is saved (perhaps) in the end, by the “person-like and tangible,” that beautiful, disconcertingly tactile image of a leaf “tying its veins” to yours:
Funken
müssen hindurch,
eine Atemnot lang


[Sparks
must cross through it,
the time of suffocation]

Gisèle, then, was no doubt right to relate the poem to those at the beginning of Atemwende [Breathturn]. Only suffocation can await those for whom there’s even a momentary suspension of contact with the world around us: its white, its green, its intricacy and sheer size.

There’s another element to the poem she’s perhaps not quite so alert to, though – maybe the reason Paul sent it to her in the first place. The emphasis throughout on stitching, sewing, might be seen as an allusion to the precision of her own engraver’s art. But what is being embroidered on this particular tapestry loom? Could it be (one hesitates to say it) some kind of shroud? (“Tumuli, tumuli”).

The two had collaborated often on sets of images to match his words. Even towards the end (as the letters, with their long lists of attachments, indicate), this was the lifeline he was reluctant to lose.

Did he see Gisèle’s role, then, as a little like Odysseus’ faithful wife Penelope’s? Despite unpicking her work night after night, restarting it each morning, there was, finally, no way of preventing it from taking form in the end: the full-stop to his story, laid out in advance.





Notes:

1. Unless otherwise specified, all translations are by the author.


Works cited:
  • Badiou, Bertrand, & Eric Celan, ed. Paul Celan & Gisèle Celan-Lestrange: Correspondance (1951-1970), avec un choix de letters de Paul Celan à son fils Eric. I – Lettres. La Librairie du XXIe siècle. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2001.
  • Badiou, Bertrand, & Eric Celan, ed. Paul Celan & Gisèle Celan-Lestrange: Correspondance (1951-1970), avec un choix de letters de Paul Celan à son fils Eric. II – Commentaires et Illustrations. La Librairie du XXIe siècle. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2001.
  • Büchner, Georg. Sämtliche Werke und Briefe: Dramen / Prosa / Briefe / Dokumente. Ed. Fritz Bergemann. 1965. München: Deutscher Tachenbuch Verlag, 1967.
  • Büchner, Georg. The Complete Plays: Danton’s Death; Leonce and Lena; Woyzeck; The Hessian Courier, Lenz; On Cranial Nerves, Selected Letters. Ed. Michael Patterson. A Methuen Paperback. London: Methuen, 1987.
  • Fairley, Ian, trans. Paul Celan: Snow Part. [‘Schneepart’, 1971]. Riverdale-on-Hudson, New York: The Sheep Meadow Press, 2007.
  • Felstiner, John (i). Paul Celan: Poet, Survivor, Jew. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.
  • Felstiner, John, trans (ii). Paul Celan: Selected Poems and Prose. New York & London: W. W. Norton, 2001.
  • Fitzgerald, F. Scott. The Great Gatsby. In The Bodley Head Scott Fitzgerald. Vol. I: The Great Gatsby; The Last Tycoon and Some Shorter Pieces. Introduction by J. B. Priestley. London: The Bodley Head, 1958. 123-269.
  • Hamburger, Michael, trans. Paul Celan: Selected Poems. 1988. Penguin International Poets. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1990.
  • Joris, Pierre, trans (i). Paul Celan: Breathturn. ['Atemwende', 1967]. Sun & Moon Classics, 74. Los Angeles: Sun & Moon Press, 1995.
  • Joris, Pierre, ed (ii). Paul Celan: Selections. Trans. Pierre Joris & Jerome Rothenberg. Poets for the Millennium, 3. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press / London: University of California Press, Ltd., 2005.
  • Joris, Pierre, trans (iii). Paul Celan: The Meridian: Final Version - Drafts - Materials. Ed. Bernhard Böschenstein & Heino Schmull, with Michael Schwarzkopf & Christiane Wittkop. 1999. Meridian: Crossing Aesthetics. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2011.
  • Paolucci, Anne & Henry, ed. Hegel on Tragedy. Anchor Books. New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1962.
  • Tolkien, J. R. R. On Fairy-Stories: Expanded Edition, with Commentary and Notes. 1947 & 1964. Ed. Verlyn Flieger & Douglas A. Anderson. London: HarperCollins Publishers, 2008.
  • Waldrop, Rosmarie, trans. Paul Celan: Collected Prose. 1986. Fyfield Books. Manchester: Carcanet Press Limited, 2003.
  • Weidemann, Barbara, ed. Paul Celan: Die Gedichte. Kommentierte Gesamtausgabe in einem Band. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2003.


[Paul Celan & Gisèle Celan-Lestrange:
Correspondance, vol. II (2001)]



(26/4-17/7/12)

brief 46 – The Survival Issue (2012): 85-101.

[3149 wds]


brief 46 (2012)






Sunday

The Twenty-Year Masterclass (2012)



Jack Ross & Emma Smith: Celanie (2012)

Introduction:
The Twenty-Year Masterclass



Michael Henry Heim (1943-2012)


In July 2003, at the “Poetics of Exile” conference at Auckland University, I gave a paper on some translations I’d made from Paul Celan’s last, posthumous book of poems Schneepart (1971). It was a large conference, with a number of parallel sessions, and I happened to be sitting beside a scholarly looking gentleman who mentioned to me that he was weighing up attending the Celan paper with another equally attractive one in another room.

His name, he said, was Michael Henry Heim, a translator from German and various other European languages (in fact he told me that he was fresh from a multi-lingual bootcamp held by Günter Grass for prospective translators of his work). When I confessed to him that the Celan paper in question was in fact by me, he asked me if I was familiar with the new edition of Celan’s letters to his wife which had just appeared.

“No,” I admitted. “Actually my German’s not that great.”

Snorting slightly at the hubris of someone who dared to essay a translation of Celan without complete fluency in the language, Heim replied, “Well, you can read French, can’t you? It’s all in French. That’s the language they wrote to each other in ...”

That was the end of our conversation, and so far as I know he was wise enough to avoid my paper in favour of the other one. I do owe him a considerable debt, though, for putting me onto the Paul Celan / Gisèle Celan-Lestrange correspondence.

Without having actually seen and consulted these two lovingly edited volumes (assembled by the poet’s widow over years, then collated and annotated by his son Eric and scholar-translator Bertrand Badiou) , I don’t think I’d ever have grasped just how important a event this was for Celaniens. There are, to be sure, other collections and editions of Celan’s correspondence with various people: Nelly Sachs, Ingeborg Bachmann, Ilana Shmueli, and a number of others not yet available in English. Each of them has its points of interest, as a writer’s letters generally do.

The letters to Gisèle are vital for two reasons, though. First, because he was forced to write to her in French, given the rudimentary nature of her German. Secondly, because she was the person he was most desperate to have understand him: to grasp as thoroughly as possible what he was about both as a man and an artist – not I think that he would have drawn much of a distinction between the two.

“Read! Just keep reading. Understanding comes of itself,” was Celan’s answer to those critics who found his work excessively obscure or “hermetisch” [hermetic] during his lifetime (Coetzee, 2008, p.116). But how was Gisèle to “keep reading” if her linguistic skills weren’t even up to parsing Goethe or Heine, let alone their far more difficult heir? From an early stage, almost from the beginning of their twenty-year relationship, Celan would include drafts of poems in his letters. Crucially, though, he was careful to accompany them with little mini-lexicons and vocabulary lists – often with complete literal French translations.

The fact that all of the 90-odd poems included in the correspondence are in German, with non-poetic, verbatim French translations supplied by Celan implies that for him poetry could only exist in one language, his mother tongue, despite his great fluency in and love for a number of others – despite, too, the early set of surrealist prose-poems composed by him in Romanian in the mid to late 40s. The fact that he didn’t continue to write in that language implies that he found the experience in some way unrewarding.

The way in which he annotates and “explains” the poems included in these letters – with linguistic precision but no other general or thematic aids to meaning – also tells us a good deal about how he meant readers of other languages to approach his poetry: through the detail, rather than metaphoric conveniences such as context and atmosphere – a poet’s poems, rather than a survivor’s.

That’s not to say that these letters aren’t revealing on a personal level. For the most part, though, one’s struck by the charm and openness of Gisèle’s letters (many of which have had to be omitted from the Badiou edition, given their length and frequency), and the intense reticence and refusal to poeticise in Paul’s. It’s only in expounding the poems that he allows himself much licence for emotion (or size, for that matter).

Ninety poems is only a fraction of his work as a whole, of course, but it’s hard to imagine how any future translator can overlook these authorised literal versions when considering even such major poems as “Matière de Bretagne.”

The couple only corresponded while they were apart, which leads to certain distortions of chronology: but Celan’s increasingly frequent visits to Germany each sparked a number of letters.

Nor did their increasing estrangement, as a result of his violent breakdowns and hospitalisations in the 1960s, cut off the supply of poems. If anything, it made them more crucial to him as a means of communication. Long sequences continued to be sent to Gisèle (mostly, admittedly, for collaborative artistic projects), but also as if he hoped that by understanding them she could somehow get to the core of her husband, and thus, in some sense – who knows? – help to heal him. Or perhaps it was even more basic than that: a hand reaching out in the darkness.

I’ve been reading in and around these letters for almost ten years now, since Michael Heim passed on that invaluable tip. Recently I’ve undertaken another translation project, going through each of the 90 poems included among the letters, and turning them into English through the medium of these French bilingual versions.

Perhaps this will never be enough to convince those determined to convict Celan of needless obscurity and obscurantism – “You sounded like Goebbels” as one young German poet remarked to him when he gave a reading at Gruppe 47 in 1952 ((Felstiner, 1995, 65). But it’s hard to imagine any better starting-place for readers who have a sincere desire to come to terms with one of the most fascinating and controversial poets of the twentieth century.

Of course it helps to have some French. While the letters themselves could of course be translated into English (and no doubt someday will be), it’s hard to see how this will really benefit students of Celan’s poetry. The point of the commentaries and glossaries he included in these letters to Gisèle lies in his refusal (or inability) to engage creatively with French, the everyday language of his domesticity, business and familial love.[1]

Bertrand Badiou is at pains to point out the inevitable limitations of his work as the editor of these letters, the impenetrable nature of Celan's inner life. It's something even to obtain access in this way to his family life, though – an aspect of Celan only really on display here.

Badiou also remarks in his introduction:
Lire ces lettres doublées de poèmes, c'est aussi mesurer l'espace ou Celan pratique habituellement sa langue et qu'il appelait parfois, non sans humour, sa «Celanie»: la rue des Ecoles, la rue de Lota, la rue de Montevideo, la rue de Longchamp, la rue d’Ulm, la rue Cabanis (Clinique de la Faculté, Sainte-Anne), la rue Tournefort et l’avenue Emile Zola. Autour de cet espace en existe un autre, a peine plus vaste, incluant Moisville, Epinay-sur-Seine, Le Vésinet, Suresnes et Epinay-sur-Orge. Celan a choisi de faire figurer presque tous ces noms de lieu sur les manuscrits de ses poèmes, comme des prolongements de leur premières version datée et «inaltérée», ainsi que sur nombre de ses livres annotés, les annexant de la sorte a son écriture. (Badiou, 2001, 2: 10).

[Reading these letters doubled with poems is also to delimit the space where Celan habitually deployed his language, and which he referred to – not entirely seriously – as his “Celanie”: the Rue des Ecoles, the Rue de Lota, the Rue de Montevideo, the Rue de Longchamp, the Rue d’Ulm, the Rue Cabanis (Faculty Clinic, Saint-Anne), the Rue Tournefort and Emile Zola Avenue. Around this space exists another one, not much larger, which included the towns of Moisville, Epinay-sur-Seine, Le Vésinet, Suresnes and Epinay-sur-Orge. Celan chose to include almost all of these place-names on the manuscripts of his poems, like guarantees on their first dated and “unalterable” versions, as well as on quite a number of his own annotated books, thus – in a sense – annexing them to the world of his writing.]

When the artist Emma Smith and I came up with the idea of this book: an amalgam of images and poems, both “translated” from our own understanding of Paul Celan’s work, it was this idea of a “Celanie”, the little set of Parisian streets and suburbs which constituted the heart of Celan's world, which inspired us, and which ended up giving us the title for this book.

We, too, would like to think of these images, accompanied by English versions from his German-French dual-text poems, as a kind of “Celanie” – our own take on that particular region of the imagination which can only be accessed through Celan's strange, bleak, wintry words: a place which, once visited, can never be forgotten.

It's not that we mean to usurp or claim the rich particularity of Paul Celan's work – simply to do tribute to it in our own way, and (hopefully) to inspire others to put on record their own “Celanie”: their own individual understandings of the world of one of our age's most individual and troubling poets.





Notes:

1. The German edition, translated by Eugen Helmlé and Barbara Wiedemann, which appeared at the same time as the French one, can also claim a certain linguistic authority - but still has to cede to the French in this respect.


Works Cited:
  • Celan, Paul, & Gisèle Celan-Lestrange. (2001). Correspondance (1951-1970), avec un choix de letters de Paul Celan à son fils Eric. Ed. Bertrand Badiou & Eric Celan. 2 vols. La Librairie du XXIe siècle. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
  • Coetzee, J. M. (2008). “Paul Celan and his Translators.” Inner Workings: Literary Essays 2000-2005. 2007. A Vintage Book. Sydney: Random House Australia. 114-31.
  • Felstiner, John. (1995). Paul Celan: Poet, Survivor, Jew. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Further Reading:
  • Celan, Paul. Gesammelte Werke in fünf Bänden. Ed. Beda Allemann & Stefan Reichert. 1983. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Verlag, 1986.
  • Joris, Pierre, ed. Paul Celan: Selections. Trans. Pierre Joris & Jerome Rothenberg. Poets for the Millennium, 3. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press / London: University of California Press, Ltd., 2005.
  • Ross, Jack. “Meeting Paul Celan”, paper delivered at the Poetics of Exile conference at Auckland University in July 2003. [Available online at: http://mairangibay.blogspot.com/2007/03/meeting-paul-celan.html]
  • Ross, Jack. “Poems from Schneepart: Five Translations from Paul Celan.” Percutio 1 (2006). [Available online at: http://titus.books.online.fr/Percutio/Percutio.htm#Celan]
  • Ross, Jack. “Channelling Paul Celan.” Rabbit 5 (2012).
  • Ross, Jack. “Interpreting Paul Celan.” brief 46 (2012).
  • Waldrop, Rosmarie, trans. Paul Celan: Collected Prose. 1986. Fyfield Books. Manchester: Carcanet Press Limited, 2003.
  • Weidemann, Barbara, ed. Paul Celan: Die Gedichte. Kommentierte Gesamtausgabe in einem Band. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2003.


(12/7/11-5/11/12)

Celanie: Poems & Drawings after Paul Celan. Poems by Jack Ross, Drawings by Emma Smith, with an Afterword by Bronwyn Lloyd. ISBN 978-0-473-22484-4. Pania Samplers, 3. 168 pp. (Auckland: Pania Press, 2012): 11-16.

[1871 wds]


Celanie (2012)





Saturday

Channelling Paul Celan (2012)



Rabbit 5 The RARE Issue (September 2012)

Channelling Paul Celan



Jean Daive: Under the Dome (2009)


I’ve just finished reading a curious little book called Under the Dome: Walks with Paul Celan, by a Belgian poet called Jean Daive. Daive got to know Celan in the last days of his life, when he was separated from his wife Gisèle and living at a loose end in Paris, trying to avoid yet another incarceration in the mental hospital.

One irritating aspect of Daive’s book – part of a larger autobiographical / essayistic project called La Condition d'infini [Condition of the infinite] – is the lack of exact information it actually gives us about Celan. Daive was in his twenties at the time, and rather self-obsessed (it was, after all, the late 1960s – the days of rage). He was clearly flattered by the older poet’s attentions, but has a tendency to concentrate his narrative on the matters that interest him most: Celan’s proposal to translate his first book Décimale blanche [White Decimal] into German, for instance.

At times one begins to question whether Daive really ever met Celan at all. The Celan in his pages is always going on about Kafka, Rilke, Tsvetayeva, like a walking signifier of the idea “Poet.” This brief exchange after Daive has been to visit him in the hospital, for instance:
When I leave Sainte-Geneviève-des-Bois that I too experience as a prison house, a feeling of freedom washes over me. Between the road and the hospital, a peaceful space, a meadow slopes towards an absence of walls. When I point this out to him:
– No more need for walls, no more need for barbed wire as in the concentration camps. The incarceration is chemical. The prisoner is chemical: he cannot take two steps on his own. But he can look at the outside. He can talk, right…. [sic. – for “write”?] (Daive, 24)

I suppose the suspicion is unjustified. Celan did, after all, end up translating that book of Daive’s: so much is on the historical record. They must have walked and talked together. Nor is it really Daive’s fault that our obsession with Paul Celan has grown so great that this one section of a larger work has been translated into English independently of the rest, and is now being presented solely as a contribution to Celan studies.

It doesn’t help that the entire book is composed of short, disjointed aphorisms and paragraphs, divorced from context or chronology, giving the sense of a great many conversations, a great many walks, but not really committing itself to how many, or exactly when they took place.

One can’t really ignore Daive’s book, then, but nor can one entirely trust it. Too much of it seems composed long after the fact – fudged up from the known facts and experiences of Celan’s life. This account of a translation session, for example:
Paul Celan signals refusal, distance, perhaps rejection. He remains deliberately absent. I sit at the table; he, at a slant, both hands on the table top. His lips move. Then his right hand and thumb hold his left wrist. Time passes. He counts the time. His lips move, I gather that Paul Celan is taking his pulse and counting. Episode of a translation.
– For it is said, thou shalt translate on the seventh day.
– In which passage of the Bible is this written?
– A passage in my head.
– Ah.
– The seventh day is the day of language in pure suspense.
– And what does language do during the six preceding days?
– It gives in to duplication.
– You mean speaking doubles the world?
– Speaking doubles the world ... yes. (Daive, 114–15)

I’d like to believe all this, but could anyone remember so much dialogue, so precisely, after a gap of twenty-five years? (Sous la coupole [Under the Dome] first appeared in 1996). Perhaps he kept a journal.




I never met Paul Celan. I was seven years old when he committed suicide by drowning himself in the Seine in 1970. Nor did I really start to notice him as a poet till I’d spent years poring over Kafka and Rilke – my favourites among the modern German writers.

It was, in fact, on or about the 27th of July, 1990, that I first started to read Paul Celan more attentively (beyond the obvious “Death Fugue”). How can I be so precise? Well, that is one of the benefits of dating your books as you buy them – something Celan himself knew very well: he was quite obsessive about noting the place and time of every draft of every one of his poems. So I can feel fairly sure that I was living in Edinburgh at the time, and that buying a copy of Michael Hamburger’s translation of Celan’s Selected Poems must have constituted some kind of victory lap on the completion of my Doctoral thesis on Latin-American literature …

I loved the poems immediately. Or, rather, I loved what I could make out of them through the medium of Hamburger’s version, which still seems to me one of the musical and deft attempts at a Celan in English. It didn’t hurt that Hamburger is himself a poet, and had served a long apprenticeship on many other German authors before committing himself to this work.

It’s strange. As I leaf through the book now, I find some little inserted pages of extra poems. I must have taken one of the later editions of Hamburger’s work out of the library and copied them. I have no memory at all of having done so, but perhaps that’s because my growing Celan obsession did not stand still at Hamburger. No, not at all.

The next exhibit on my shelves is the original 1983 five-volume standard edition of Celan’s complete works in German (in a paperback reprint). It was, I see, bought by me in Vienna on the 24th of August 1990. And what was I doing there? I was, in fact, on my honeymoon. My PhD thesis was being read back in the UK, but I’d just got married to a half-English, half-Belgian girl I’d met at Edinburgh University.

You’d think that we’d have had better things to do than hunt all over Vienna for a copy of Paul Celan – I still remember climbing off a bus tour of the city halfway through and cutting across town to the bookshop where we’d ordered it the day before. But it seemed very important at the time. It was nice to leaf through the first three volumes, which gave all his published works in poetry and prose. What really surprised and intrigued me, though, were the last two volumes, devoted (respectively) to dual-text versions of all his translations from French (volume 4: 885 pages), and other languages (volume 5: 665 pages).

The languages on display included English, Italian, Portuguese, Romanian and Russian. There were even a few translations from Hebrew. It wasn’t so much his linguistic erudition that struck me, though, as the extent of his commitment to the craft of translation. Looking through his versions of Rimbaud’s “Bateau ivre” or Marianne Moore’s “Poetry,” one had the sense of a poet whose technical command of both languages was almost unbounded. Give him the task of creating a facsimile of a pre-existing poem, whether it be by Guillaume Apollinaire, Osip Mandelstam or Emily Dickinson, and you could be sure of an air-tight, elegant, almost ego-less job.




Ten years went by. My wife returned home to Belgium from New Zealand. Shortly afterwards, we got divorced. I bought a copy of John Felstiner’s 1995 biography Paul Celan: Poet, Survivor, Jew on (I see) 20th October 2000.

By then, though, I’d started to lose my awe at the mere idea of the man. The immense tragedy of being Paul Celan, the vehicle of all that Holocaust mystique, the living refutation of Theodor Adorno’s famous aphorism at the impossibility (or is it immorality?) of writing lyric poetry after Auschwitz, began to shade off into the lineaments of an actual human being.

One help in that process was reading Israel Chalfen’s charming 1979 book Paul Celan: A Biography of His Youth. The examples Chalfen gives of early, Heine-esque lyrics by a young Romanian dreamer called Paul Antschel (“Celan,” his pseudonym, came later, after the war) allowed me to glimpse the shadow of a quite different writer: a rather predictable lyricist in the classic German mode, with a bent towards nostalgia.

“Paul Celan’s” later tormented, tortured experiments in syntax seem to have been not so much inspired by his experiences as a workcamp inmate on the Eastern front, as forced on him by his desire to avoid the slickness of official German: a monster language easily adaptable to monstrous realities. But it might not have been so at all. His life could have been so very different.

It sounds absurdly frivolous, but I began to wonder what sorts of people he’d really have liked to have spent time with, had things panned out differently. I thought of that Nic Roeg film Insignificance, where Marilyn Monroe, Albert Einstein, Senator McCarthy and Joe DiMaggio all meet in a New York hotel in 1954. I thought of Ken Russell’s Lisztomania, with the hapless Liszt being parachuted into Germany to wow his adoring fans.

The result was a sequence of poems called The Britney Suite, written in late 2000. You have to remember how golden Britney Spears looked then, having just released her second album, with that memorable video of the pyramids of Mars splitting open to reveal a red cat-suited Britney bopping to “Oops, I did it again …”

Her published utterances, too, were so fascinatingly empty, so full of Zen inscrutability: “Watching TV … or just staring at the wall is fun,” or “You can be a good person and still be sexy” (Katz, 6-7). Anyway, all of a sudden it seemed like a brilliant idea to bring the two of them, Britney and Paul, together – not physically, as in the play Nic Roeg based his film on, but in the virtual space of a random modern city.

I’d already worked on a couple of collaborations with film-maker and photographer Gabriel White, so we came up with the idea of a screenplay which would combine translations from Paul Celan’s bleak last book of poems Schneepart [Snow part], published posthumously in 1971, with similarly disturbing apparitions from popular culture.

Strangely enough – or not so strangely, in retrospect – our applications for funding for this opus were ignored, so instead I put out the poems as a tiny, limited-edition (and so now exceedingly rare) chapbook, with the five Celan translations I’d completed for the project being published separately in the magazine Percutio in 2006.




The first intimation I got that anyone else could be taking an interest in my own private games with Paul Celan – besides my friend Gabriel, that is – came when I decided to post the whole sequence online, on my blog The Imaginary Museum, in March 2007.

I included a short presentation I’d done as an introduction to the poems at a conference called “The Poetics of Exile” in July 2003. The paper, called “Meeting Paul Celan,” elicited the following comment:
Pierre Joris said...

Asked to contribute to an anthology called "My poem is my knife," Celan wrote back to the editor suggesting that for him, Celan, the poem "was a handshake" — i.e. an encounter. Which buttresses your sense of the importance of the encounter in Celan's work.
Maybe I have spent too much time these last 40 years thinking about Celan & translating his work, & maybe Celan's work has been too essential for my own writing for me to have a detached view on this, but the association of PC with Britney Spears makes me shudder ...

I have to say that it still gives me a bit of a shock to think of Pierre Joris, doyen of Celan scholars, bothering to leave a comment on a humble little blog run by some amateur Celanien in New Zealand. Nothing if not opinionated, though. I promptly replied in my best toplofty manner:
Jack Ross said...

I guess, in a way, that was the point I was trying to make. What ontological manoeuvrings could ever reconcile the universe of Celan with that of Britney Spears?
It would be a completely idle question if it didn't happen to be the universe I find myself living in every time I turn on the television or the computer ... I know it seems almost blasphemous to those who revere the memory of Celan – an attitude I sympathise with very much – but, as a writer, I guess I also have a duty to report the world I see around me. If it weren't jarring, it wouldn't make its point.

Shades of Jean Daive! The impudence of situating myself side by side with Celan as fellow “writers” … The really astonishing thing about it all, though, was the way at least one other reader came to my defence:
Kake said...

This is interesting. I don’t know anything about German or Paul Celan, but these versions obviously breathe without life-support and "Meeting Paul Celan" is a really useful introduction to them.
If Celan’s poetry articulates linguistic exile, then translation could be its ideal manifestation. Relying on a non-existent equivalence, translation tends to generate its own incidental ‘acts of non-communication’. Translating Celan must be like walking on a tightrope when you are constantly swatting the wire with your own balancing pole. Example: the word 'both-handed' only works because it sounds incompletely rendered into English. ‘Ambidextrous’ would have set completely the wrong tone and (I imagine) would have been incorrect anyway because some level of dissonance/ambiguity is the point.
I particularly like the choice of ‘Manukau’ for ‘Moldau’ – the geographical swap simultaneously directs and disorients the reader, and draws attention to the translation as an alteration.
Only just noticed the Star of David around Britney’s neck in the keith partridge y yo post.


And there the matter rested. For a while, at any rate.




I recently (September 3, 2011) put up another post on my blog called “Collecting Paul Celan.” It was an attempt to give a kind of annotated reading list for all the material about the poet I’d found useful to date. A good many of the books I included were bought by me in Melbourne when I was there last year giving yet another Celan paper (“The Twenty-Year Masterclass: Paul Celan’s Correspondence with Gisèle Celan-Lestrange, 1951-1970”) at yet another conference. This one, held at Monash University from 11-12 July, was called Literature and Translation.

There are (for example) at least three books of Celan’s letters now available in English (his correspondences with, respectively, the Nobel-prize-winning Holocaust poet Nelly Sachs; Ingeborg Bachmann, his lover in the 1940s in Vienna, before he moved to France; and Ilana Shmueli, a woman he knew as a child in Romania before the war, then met again in Israel in the 1960s.

Five of his eight books of poems have now been translated in their entirety: one of them, Fadensonnen (1968) in two separate versions. There are also volumes of selections from Celan by John Felstiner and Pierre Joris as well as Michael Hamburger. There’s even a translation of some early prose poems he wrote in Romanian in the late 1940s (perhaps in an attempt to sidestep German as his only possible literary language).

For more information, you can look at the post yourselves (details are included in “Works cited” at the end of this essay). In any case, I included a lot of pictures of the various books, together with a few editorial remarks. What was my surprise, then, to receive the following comment:
Pierre Joris said...

looking forward to hear what you have to say about the big MERIDIAN book (took me 7 years to translate it...). Glad to have your selection of Celaniana to send people to. & thanks for the good words re my translations. Wish you could be at the performance presentation “Paul Celan —Pierre Joris: Celebrating 45 Years of Translation & Reflection” I'll be giving at harvard in November, backed by Nicole Peyrafitte's audio-visual collages.

It’s true that I had said that “Joris has a good claim to be considered the most subtle living interpreter of Celan's poetry and thought,” when introducing his trilogy of versions of Celan’s three last books, as well as praising his one-volume selected works, but it was nice to know that I had – at least to some extent – repaired my gaffe with regards to Britney Spears.

I haven’t yet followed up with a post on Joris’s book-length translation of the drafts for Celan’s 1960 “Meridian” speech – the central statement on his aesthetics. One obstacle has been my lack of familiarity with nineteenth-century German dramatist Georg Büchner. Celan’s speech was made on the occasion of receiving the prestigious Büchner prize, and he was careful to couch his ideas almost entirely in terms taken from Büchner’s own work: his play Danton’s Death, his short story “Lenz,” and his somewhat better-known posthumous play Woyzeck (subject of a memorable film version by Werner Herzog, with Klaus Kinski playing the eponymous soldier-murderer).

More to the point, though, I have just completed a somewhat larger project: a complete translation of all the 90-odd poems included in the French edition of Celan’s letters to his wife – a kind of anthology of his work from first to last, but embellished by the vocabulary notes and (on occasion) complete literal French versions he made for her benefit. They’ll be appearing later this year, in a limited edition from Pania Press, together with a number of pictures by artist Emma Smith, and a preface by art historian Bronwyn Lloyd.

It’s taken me more than two years to put this set of translations together, and it seems to me at the moment the furthest extent of my involvement with any foreign-language poet. The strangest thing about it, though, is that having finished work on these versions, I still don’t feel much closer to a real knowledge of Paul Celan – the man or his poems.

The more books I read about him, the more time I spend on reading his work, the farther he seems to recede from me. I guess, in a sense, that’s why I enjoyed Jean Daive’s book so much. Daive (of course) has an incomparably better claim than I do to talk to us about his friend. But one can see in the fragmentary nature of his text how little all those snippets of conversation, those remembered meetings really added up to in the end:
There is no color in Paul's books (he also never wears colors). But there are all the nuances of white, black, gray.
– Pigeon gray – Paris gray, he says. [p.24]

What is that supposed to mean? Snow, whiteness, black marks on the snow, these are all potent images in Celan’s work (associated, we’re told, with his mother’s death in a Nazi concentration camp in the Ukraine). The colour red does come up quite often, though:
The trace
you witness here
was hammered in
redder than red

for instance, in the poem beginning “Dunstbänder-, Spruchbänder-Aufstand” [Banners of fog, of stencil, rise] from Atemwende [Breathturn] (Weidemann, 212) [my translation]. Or:
– I was in a hotel room in London when I saw God under my door: a ray, a streak of light. (Daive, 69)

Celan refers quite frequently to this event elsewhere. So did he actually repeat it to Daive, or did the latter simply add it into the mix from his own later reading? Who can know?

I suppose the point of these twenty years of reading Paul Celan, these ten years of struggling to interpret and translate his texts, is hard to sum up in a phrase. There are things about him which still puzzle and perturb me – reaches of experience almost unimaginable to someone as sheltered as me: as most of us, in fact. But I don’t find his thought, his fractured diction, particularly alienating. He seems, on the contrary, to speak to me directly.

I acknowledge how allusive he is – how necessary annotations and marginal comments can be to a deeper understanding of his work. The same is true of most poets, after all. There’s a tone, an ambience which surrounds him, though – what Jorge Luis Borges (speaking of aesthetics in general) called “this imminence of a revelation that does not occur” (Borges, 223).

I don’t how else to explain it than by trying to show it to you in action: in that early, much-translated poem “Matiére de Bretagne” [Matter of Britain], where the props of the Tristan story (the blood-red sail, the two Iseults) are deployed to produce an almost literal sense of haunting: the ghost of a life that might have been, of a world that might not have split from top to bottom, of a man who might not have had to drown in the icy waves of the Seine:
Gorselight, yellow, slopes
against the skyThorn
disinfects your woundsRing
out, it’s eveningNothing
crosses the sea to pray
The bloodred sheet sets sail for you

Arid, dried-out, bed
behind youScar-
invadedStar-
embossedmilky inlets
in the vaseDate
stones underneath, furred blue
tufts of forgetfulness
your memory

(Do you know me
hands? I went
by the forked route you showed
me, my mouth spat pebbles, I walked
through snowdrifts, shadow – do you know me?)

Hands, the thorn-
burnt wound rings out
Hands, nothing, the sea
Hands, in the gorse-light
the bloody sheet
sets sail for you

You
you teach
your teach your hands
you teach your hands, you teach
you teach your hands
to sleep


Works cited:
  • Borges, Jorge Luis, “The Wall and the Books.” In Labyrinths: Selected Stories and Other Writings. Ed. Donald A. Yates & James E. Irby. Preface by André Maurois. 1964. Penguin Classics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2000. 221-23.
  • Celan, Paul. Gesammelte Werke. 5 vols. Ed. Beda Allemann & Stefan Reichert. 1983. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Verlag, 1986.
  • Celan, Paul. Selected Poems. Trans. Michael Hamburger. 1988. Penguin International Poets. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1990.
  • Daive, Jean. Under the Dome: Walks With Paul Celan. 1996. Trans. Rosmarie Waldrop. Série d'écriture, 22. Anyart, Providence: Burning Deck Press, 2009.
  • Katz, Marcelle. “Oops, she did it again …: An Interview with Britney Spears.” TV Guide (NZ) (October 13, 2000): 6-7.
  • Ross, Jack, Paul Celan, & Wendy Nu. The Britney Suite. Auckland: Perdrix Press, 2001. [Available at: http://perdrixpress.blogspot.co.nz/2011/04/britney-suite-2001_21.html]
  • Ross, Jack. “Paul Celan: Poems from Schneepart: Translations into English.” Percutio 1 (2006): 60-62. [Available at: http://titus.books.online.fr/Percutio/Percutio.htm#Celan]
  • Ross, Jack. “Meeting Paul Celan: A Paper presented at the Poetics of Exile conference, Auckland University (July 2003).” The Imaginary Museum (March 23, 2007). [Available at: http://mairangibay.blogspot.co.nz/2007/03/meeting-paul-celan.html]
  • Ross, Jack. “Celanie: 5 Versions from Paul Celan.” brief 41 (2010): 54-59.
  • Ross, Jack. “The Twenty-Year Masterclass: Paul Celan’s Correspondence with Gisèle Celan-Lestrange (1951-1970)." Literature and Translation conference, Monash University, Melbourne (11-12 July 2011). [Abstract available at:
    http://www.aal.asn.au/conference/2011/speakers/ross---the-twenty-year-masterclass-paul-celans-cor.shtml]
  • Ross, Jack. “Collecting Paul Celan.” The Imaginary Museum (September 3, 2011). [Available at: http://mairangibay.blogspot.co.nz/2011/09/collecting-paul-celan.html]
  • Weidemann, Barbara, ed. Paul Celan. Die Gedichte: Kommentierte Gesamtausgabe in einem Band. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2003.


(10-13/7/12)

Rabbit 5: The RARE Issue (Winter 2012): 118-31.

[3843 wds]


Rabbit 5 (2012)