Showing posts with label 2021. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2021. Show all posts

Tuesday

Relics of John Perry (2025)


Emily Cumming Harris: In New Zealand and Australia

Catherine Field-Dodgson & Michele Leggott:
New Zealand Liliaceae, 1906


In January we received an intriguing email from archivist Katherine Pawley at the University of Auckland. ‘It just leapt out at me,’ she told us, indicating a link to a tall skinny painting by an unknown artist at Webb’s auction house in Auckland. As soon as we clicked on the link we knew what we were looking at. Katherine’s instincts were spot-on: this was another of Emily’s large 1906 oil paintings, and it hasn’t been seen in over twenty years.

Emily Cumming Harris, New Zealand Liliaceae, oil on board, 1170 x 410 mm.

We have been searching for this panel since first reading about it in a 1906 newspaper article. New Zealand Liliaceae featured prominently in the Nelson Evening Mail’s list of the paintings that Emily was sending to the International Exhibition in Christchurch that year:

By to-day’s steamer Miss Harris, of Nile-street, forwarded 12 oil paintings to the Christchurch Exhibition. The collection has been made at the request of the West Coast Executive, and will be displayed in the West Coast Court. The paintings reflect great credit on the artist, who is already widely known in connection with her productions of New Zealand flowers and birds. The collection includes three panels, — clematis indivisa, New Zealand mountain flowers, and New Zealand liliaceae — and also paintings of yellow kowhai and bell birds, Whau, entelea arborescens, gentians, kiekie, nikau, red neinei, turutu, senecios, pohutukawa, manuka, tainui, everlastings, honeysuckle flowers, rata (scarlet). Miss Harris will also have two panels of Antarctic flowers in the Nelson portion of the art gallery. (Nelson Evening Mail 9 Oct 1906: 2)

Then we found the panel mentioned in a contemporary auction record. New Zealand Liliaceae sold in 2002 for $358 at Dunbar Sloane in Wellington. Quite a story emerged when we realised that well-known art and ephemera collector John Perry must have purchased the painting in 2002, bundled it into his van and driven it back to ‘Global Village Antiques’, which he housed in the old Regent Theatre in Helensville. Perry died in 2021 and his vast collection – the equivalent of four tennis courts – is now being catalogued and slowly brought to auction by Webbs. Emily’s panel was being advertised for sale at Webb’s as part of Perry’s estate, alongside other fascinating artifacts that included road signs, shells and folk art cat sculptures.

...

When it was at Webbs in January, New Zealand Liliaceae had only John Perry’s business details and a catalogue number on the reverse, and the lower part of the frame appeared to be damaged.



We are delighted to report that Emily’s Liliaceae painting is now safely in the collection of a museum, where it will undergo some much-needed restoration work and we hope to visit it soon along with Harris descendants. Meanwhile we remain ever curious and watchful to see what other treasures might come to light from the John Perry estate.

Not for the first time we wish that a rediscovered work could tell us more about where it has been. In this instance, we are lucky to have insights from a range of art professionals and collectors who knew John Perry and wrote memorials after his death in 2021, commemorating an extraordinary passion for many different kinds of art and object.

Briar Williams:

If you’ve been anywhere in the art world in New Zealand in the past 50 years, you will have come across John F. Perry. New Zealand’s artistic and cultural landscape was greatly diminished, when John Perry the artist, obsessive collector, ex museum curator, arts writer for AASD and other publications but most importantly friend / mentor to many, passed away at home above his shop Global Village Antiques in the old Regent Cinema in Helensville, West Auckland on 6 June 2021.

Jack Ross:

It was a real shock to hear, earlier this week, that art historian, curator and antique dealer John Perry had died. It seems like forever that I’ve been driving up to Helensville periodically to check out his immense horde of vintage treasure: books, ceramics, furniture, pictures, prints, and everything in between.

In the early days, it was still possible to enter the body of the auditorium, and to get some sense of the sheer size of his collection. For many years now that part of the building has been closed off to the public, however, with only the front rooms accessible even to the most agile visitors.

The second-to-last time we saw him, he invited me upstairs into his apartment, and I got some sense of how he lived there, surrounded by pictures and curios, with his rooftop garden out the front, there on the outskirts of the ancient Kauri kingdom of Helensville.

Mind you, it didn’t seem too bad a place to live out your days – his apartment had a slightly Latin American air, as if he were one of those retired Colonels in a García Márquez novel, watching the rains come and go across the sinuous flatlands of the Kaipara.

Given John Perry’s extensive knowledge of colonial art, we can be certain he recognised Emily’s New Zealand Liliaceae when it came to auction in Wellington in 2002. Did he wonder about its size and medium in relation to Emily’s better-known watercolurs? Did he realise the panel was part of a larger exhibit from 1906? We don’t know. But we can be grateful for his custodianship of the panel in Helensville and imagine with Jack Ross the painting’s secluded life on the edge of the Kaipara Harbour.


(6-9/6/21)

'New Zealand Liliaceae, 1906.'
Ed. Catherine Field-Dodgson & Michele Leggott.
Emily Cumming Harris. [Available at: https://emilycummingharris.blogs.auckland.ac.nz/2025/03/24/new-zealand-liliaceae-1906/ (24/3/25)]

[202 wds]




•



77 Days (2021)



NZ Poetry Shelf

Poetry Shelf: Writings from lockdown
77 Days


Osip Braz: Anton Chekhov (1860-1904)


When I was at high school my Russian teacher, Mr. Meijers, told us a Chekhov story, “The Bet.”

A rich man wagers a poor one he can’t spend five years in solitary confinement without going crazy. He can ask for books, or fancy food, or anything else he wants – but he’s not allowed to talk to anyone, or go outside his room.

I do remember wondering what all the fuss was about. A few years on your own, with books and entertainment of your choice – what could be wrong with that? In fact, after that, every time I bought a book I had that in the back of my mind – being stuck in my own room under house arrest.

As the years roll by, the man in the room studies languages and learns new skills; he leaves little notes asking for more textbooks. What he isn’t told is that his host has lost most of his money, and can no longer afford to settle the bet without going bankrupt.

The rich man lives in fear of his former friend.

The night before the five years are up, the man in the room escapes through a window, leaving no note behind. Perhaps he’s found out about the loss of his friend’s fortune, and decided to let him off out of pity. Perhaps all these years of enforced confinement have finally taken their toll.

Five years is an awfully long time – a scarcely conceivable weight of days. Until now, that is.

Our present lockdown, the fourth for Tāmaki Makaurau, began at midnight on Tuesday, 17th of August. As I write, at the beginning of November, only 77 days have actually gone by. But five years adds up to – give or take a leap year or so – 1824 days!

That’s almost 24 times what we’ve had to put up with so far.

And what have I done with this time?

I boxed up my father’s remaining books and carted them across the road for a church fundraiser.

I edited a webfestchrift for my friend Michele Leggott.

I wrote some posts on my blog.

I went on a diet: I’ve lost 20 kilos so far.

Oh, and I did take the trouble to look up that story. It turns out that it isn’t five years he has to spend in the room, it’s fifteen. Not 1824 days, but 5472. Not 24, but 71 times what we’ve just been through.

No doubt we’ll soon be back to normal. It hasn’t been five years – let alone fifteen – but you can’t really call it nothing, either.


•


(1-3/11/21)

'Poetry Shelf: Writings from lockdown.' Ed. Paula Green.
NZ Poetry Shelf: a poetry page with reviews, interviews, and other things.
[Available at: https://nzpoetryshelf.com/2021/11/12/poetry-shelf-writings-from-lockdown/ (12/11/21)]

[431 wds]


Poetry Box: Paula Green


•




Monday

Listening to the Silence (2021)



Chris Gallavin: A Dance Together (2021)

Introduction:
Listening to the Silence



Earlier this year, 2020, as the country prepared to go into lockdown against the COVID-19 pandemic – strange to think how quickly even this global cataclysm is bound to recede into memory – I read an interesting interview with Kiwi bard Sam Hunt.

“How do poets deal with such things?” asked the interviewer, Hunt’s longtime mate Colin Hogg.

“I’m a poet only when I’m writing a poem,” replied Hunt. “Otherwise I’m just hanging round, listening to the silence.”

Just hanging around, listening to the silence.

It’s hard to imagine a better definition of poetry than that.

Wordsworth called it “the spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings,” and added that “it takes its origin from emotion recollected in tranquillity.” That’s pretty much the same thing, though, if you think about it.

I first met Chris Gallavin at a large Academic forum at Massey University, where both of us work. I guess I was struck at once by his larger-than-life ebullience and enthusiasm for every subject he touches: Law, University Administration, and – as it turned out – poetry.

I teach poetry there, at Massey (as well as trying to write it), and I have to admit that it was a little surprising to find so much fascination in him for something which can feel, at times, like a recondite art.

We cemented this acquaintance when he invited me to stay in his sleep-out during the 2017 Manawatu Writers’ Festival, which he co-hosted with other local writers at the Feilding Public Library. I saw then the massive library of New Zealand poetry he’d amassed over the years, jostling for space with long shelves of sober law books.

Given his druthers, he told me, he’d spend all day long in the sleep-out, reading poetry and wandering around the garden, like a T’ang dynasty sage.

Gallavin’s poetic heroes are all on display in this, his first full-length collection:
And we listened to Sam ....
'Hunt' you finished the
Sentence before I could
Say we all need heroes,
Even if some like fathers
Are a bit broken-down

as he puts it in “Milla,” the second of two heartfelt poems addressed to his daughter.

James K. Baxter puts in a somewhat subdued appearance, too:
I was caught today
Reading a book of Baxter
Quietly on a sofa, where I sat
Tempted to lay my grey flecked head.

‘That looks like an old man's book’
Said with a smile.
I did not know what to say
Save a breathed and lonely,
‘Yes, I suppose it is’.

As a poet, Gallavin has many strengths. I admire the vernacular love poems he addresses to his first Ford Cortina (‘My First Love’) and his local fish n chip shop. There’s a genuine passion for New Zealand scenery and weather on display here, too.

The temptation – as always – is to continue to quote examples, but I don’t want to keep you from the body of his book any longer, so I think I’ll have to content myself with only one of these, a Bashō-like evocation of the charms of winter:
I stand at the window
Cloaked, first cold coat,
A cocoon of clouds,
In this my new winter.

Good luck, then, to Chris Gallavin in all his new ventures, poetic and otherwise!


•





Works cited:

Colin Hogg, “Sam Hunt: We’ll be wiser, weaker folk.” Newsroom (7/4/20): [Available at: https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2020/04/07/1117315/sam-hunt-well-come-out-weaker-and-wiser?fbclid=IwAR3aEk5mMEb5gRYEy9BwU6U9MRYIsH7U8sLcmh0moUFiNrXETX-FpiGRG0c].




•


(19-20/7/20)

“Introduction: Listening to the Silence.” In Chris Gallavin: A Dance Together. Feilding: Prow Publishing, 2021.

[559 wds]


•




Sunday

A Memorial Brass (2021)



brief

Obituary:
A Memorial Brass: i.m. Ted Jenner (1946-2021)



Scott Hamilton: Ted Jenner (2011)


Ted Jenner was a friend of mine. I guess one of the things I appreciated most about Ted was his unfailing cheerfulness and unflappability even when things appeared to be going very, very wrong indeed. Perhaps it was his long years working as a Classics lecturer in Malawi that accustomed him to sudden emergencies, or perhaps it was the hand-to-mouth nature of his life as a writer and teacher in New Zealand, but I never saw him at a loss for a wise and witty thing to say.

I had heard that he was ill, and even in hospital, but I'm sorry to say that the news of his death from cancer in the early hours of Friday morning still came as a shock. He wore his years lightly. He was one of that group of baby-boomer New Zealand poets, all born in 1946, at the close of World War II – Sam Hunt, Bill Manhire, Ian Wedde prominent among them – who've been so influential on our literature.

Much though I always enjoyed chatting to Ted – he was a marvellously learned man, a trained classicist with an expertise in Ancient Greek – I suppose it would be true to say that most of my knowledge of him came through his books. The below is probably not a complete list, but it includes all the titles I myself own:

  1. A Memorial Brass. Eastbourne, Wellington: Hawk Press, 1980.
  2. Dedications. Auckland: Omphalos Press, 1991.
  3. The Love-Songs of Ibykos: 22 Fragments. Images by John Reynolds. Auckland: Holloway Press, 1997.
  4. Sappho Triptych. Auckland: Puriri Press, 2007.
  5. Writers in Residence and Other Captive Fauna. Auckland: Titus Books, 2009.
  6. [Ed.] brief the fortieth (July 2010). Auckland: Titus Books, 2010.
  7. The Gold Leaves (Being an Account and Translation from the Ancient Greek of the 'So-Called' Orphic Tablets). Pokeno: Atuanui Press, 2014.
  8. ‘Complete Gold Leaves: Transcriptions of Sixteen Ancient Greek Gold Lamellae. Compiled with English Translations.’ In Bill Direen, ed. Percutio 10: A Special Issue devoted to two projects by Classicist and poet Edward Jenner. Dunedin: Percutio Publications, 2016.
  9. The Arrow that Missed. Lyttelton: Cold Hub Press, 2017.

Looking back, I seem to have written quite a lot about Ted's work over the years:


I'm not sure that there's any need to repeat all that here. In any case, it’s readily available online. Suffice it to say that for me, Ted Jenner combined the twin virtues of precise, scrupulous scholarship with an equally strong taste for experimental fiction and poetry – not that I think he saw much difference between the two genres – and the way he wrote, there really wasn't.

I recall being quite concerned when I heard that Ted was planning to review my chapbook Papyri: Love poems & fragments from Sappho & elsewhere (2007) for brief 36. Knowing no Greek, I’d adapted my versions from a literal French translation I’d picked up in a second-hand shop. I knew that he himself, adept at ancient Greek, had done his own translations in the beautiful small-press Sappho Triptych.

It came as a huge surprise when he praised my book. I suppose a true scholar has far less need to be picky and pedantic than those with a half-knowledge of the field. In any case, it certainly showed the breadth of his sympathies with unusual takes on the classics!

I’ve borrowed the title for this piece from his first collection, A Memorial Brass, exquisitely printed by Alan Loney at the Hawk Press in 1980. It seems best to conclude with some more of Ted's own words, taken from the title poem in that book:
My dear, they call us bourgeois
But it was essentially

A bourgeois thing to do –
An image of conjugal

Faith – to cross the hands over chest
And breast and stand on

The goblin pups, a monumental
Brass patent

For the bloodstream-fevers.
I remember it was cold

That May with added expense, upkeep
of allotment, and late

Spring blooms falling fierce as
Snow on the gale-lashed

Oats. Very soon a priest mumbled eight
Sacrificia patriarchae nostri

Above us. Commenting now on the
Canon of his mass, I

Like to think it was
Easy in Abraham's time –

Knowledge and fear were deliberate
Then, total, without cover; but

As for us, we lie awake
Until the sleeping's over.
My profoundest condolences to Ted's wife, Vasalua. If he were here I'm sure he could find the perfect words to thank her for making the last years of his life perhaps the happiest of all.

As for me, I'd like to say once more Ave atque vale: Hail and farewell, to one of the finest scholars and poets I've ever known. Perhaps we'll meet again some day, when the sleeping's over.


•


(8-13/7/21)

brief 57, ed. Olivia Macassey (Pokeno: Titus Books, tba)

[857 wds]


•




Saturday

Jack Ross and the Imaginary Museum of Atlantis (2021)


Apocalypse Confidential: Low Lives, High Strangeness (2021)

Daniel Miller:
Jack Ross and the Imaginary Museum of Atlantis


David Althoff: Atlantis Drawings (Pinterest, 2021)

Daniel Miller: Your first book was Nights with Giordano Bruno (2000)?
Jack Ross: It was my first “novel”, but I had written a more conventional book of poems before that, called City of Strange Brunettes (1998), about the large number of Chinese and Korean immigrants in Auckland at the time. I’d been teaching in a language school, and found the students there were interesting to talk to. When the book was published I had a girlfriend – she was a brunette – who was irritated by the title, until I “explained” to her that I meant it to mean stranger, rather than just odd.
DM: Strange brunettes are a recurring theme in literature. Shakespeare was obsessed with a mysterious dark lady. Phil K. Dick once wrote a book called The Dark Haired Girl.
JR: I have actually read that book. I had to borrow it from someone since it seems to be quite rare. Personally I thought it quite fine and innovative in form, but most fans of the Master seem to rate it fairly low among his works. But I have to confess that the title was initially inspired by the Jeunet & Caro film Cite des enfants perdus (City of Lost Children) — I wondered what Auckland was the “city of”, and that was what I came up with.
DM: How did you get from the Brunettes to Bruno?
JR: I guess I decided that there was something too tame in what I was doing, and it seemed necessary for my survival to write in a way that expressed the really intense feeling of alienation and sorrow and exile which had been building up ever since my first marriage (to a Belgian girl) ended a couple of years before. It seemed to me that I hadn’t yet found a form in which I could go all out, and say what was really on my mind. And the metaphor that I came up was insomnia. And the result was Bruno. Giordano Bruno is a figure who has appealed to me ever since I first read The Art of Memory by Frances Yates. She read him as a magus rather than a scientist, someone who desired literally to control the universe through words and symbols. It astonished and impressed me. So I gave my character the same obsession.
DM: You said earlier that people were hostile when you called Bruno a text-experiment’?
JR: It was really just one novelist. He asked what I was writing, and I said that I didn’t really know, some kind of text experiment, and he looked as if he wanted to throw up. I thought, I want to delay that gag reflex for as long as I can.
DM: How did the book develop?
JR: I came up with the first ideas for it in 1996. My initial idea was to write a book about piobaireachd, pronounced pee-brock, which in case you don’t know is a very esoteric form of musical improvisation on the bagpipes. It was introduced to Scotland by a family of Italians called the Brunos. I think that one was called Pietro Bruno. I have a brother who’s a bagpiper, and he told me this. Well, it suddenly occurred to me that the whole thing might be connected to Giordano Bruno, and his memory systems, and that provided me with the idea for a subversive book about alternate histories and alternate knowledge systems. Then I went home to New Zealand, and the book got infected with local stuff about Auckland, and the piobaireachd got lost in the mix. But I don’t want it to sound like it was purely cerebral. I was very depressed at the time — my marriage had just broken up, and I was at a loose end in a lot of ways.
DM: Writing the book had a psychological function?
JR: Oh yes. But then so did Bruno’s memory systems. As Frances Yates explains, Bruno constructed his knowledge system so that he could control it and have it present to him at all times, so that he could interfere in nature as a magus. A magus is someone who performs small acts in the world, which have repercussions in the lower and upper realms. Bruno said the end of all his systems was to transform oneself. I quote that on the title page of the novel, which actually comes halfway through the text, for various numerological reasons.
DM: I’m very interested in the number 23 …
JR: Two digits: two, and then three, which is plus two plus one. Three of course brings in all the triads and trinities. The two numbers add up to five, like the five parts of the Vitruvian man. And then if you add two to three, and then the two digits themselves you get seven, which takes us down the rabbit hole to revelations. But I should explain, the format of the published book was binary: text pages facing illustration pages, but the text pages are not continuous.
DM: The images in the book are all found images?
JR: Not all, but most of them. There are a few crude scrawls by me in there, but the majority come from alchemical texts.
DM: What is your interest in alchemy?
JR: I’m fascinated by occult systems of knowledge. I’m serious about the abilities of such systems (I would include “literature” as one of them) to do some good to the individual in terms of giving them a paradigm for self-analysis and even self-cure.
DM: Many of the people who laid the foundations of science were alchemists.
JR: Yes, that’s very much the theme of Frances Yates’ books: the mysterious zone between renaissance “magic” and enlightenment “science” — the Rosicrucians, the Illuminati — and the memory theorists like Bruno, inspired in his turn by Ramon Llull, who’s one of her great heroes. I used some of his “wheels” in another piece of fiction called Trouble in Mind, a novella I wrote, or rather “combined” out of two unrelated pieces of fiction, which was published in 2005.
DM: Are there a lot of experimental writers in Auckland?
JR: Very few. The few that do exist are mostly grouped around an obscure magazine called brief, which started life as a A Brief Description of the Whole World in 1995. A few creep into sight from time to time, then are crushed, and cast aside by history.
DM: Are you familiar with ”conceptual writing”?
JR: Not really familiar with the term — unless you mean language game experiments like OuLiPo. I’m afraid I tend to rely on my isolation to excuse my lack of knowledge of contemporary art and literary practices. The whole subject for me consists of occasional hints I get from a general hiss of white noise: Henry Darger / Kathy Acker — that kind of person.
DM: A writer from New Zealand recently won the Booker Prize.
JR: Very true. We’ve met once. I know her partner a bit better, as he’s done some teaching for us here on campus. Of course Eleanor Catton’s novel is constructed astrologically; each character’s actions governed by their horoscope. The whole thing reads like a mixture of Eugene Sue’s Mysteries of Paris and the HBO show Deadwood. I would love to be able to do what Catton does, I just don’t seem to be able to resist laying down two layers of text or putting footnotes in my text or generally foregrounding some bizarre format.
DM: How to understand this urge?
JR: I don’t know. I just get a kind of warm feeling when I see an odd-looking page, whether it’s a dream-map by Kathy Acker or an enclosed text-window by Mark Danielewski, it just fascinates me. I also very much like the idea of telling a story through a series of documents which are meant for other purposes: tax returns, or lecture notes, or annotations in the margins of another text. Perhaps it’s related to the desire to believe that the blizzard of textuality we all generate day by day is somehow adding up to …

The Imaginary Museum of Atlantis
DM: Let’s talk about the Imaginary Museum of Atlantis. The book starts with someone washing up on a beach with amnesia …
JR: Yes. I felt I wanted to write a less personal book than Bruno, and so I decided to wipe out all the personality from my protagonist, by wiping his memory clean and starting again, which is also pretty much the predominant cultural myth down here in the Antipodes.
DM: The book features many quotations.
JR: My protagonist has a notebook which he uses as a kind of portable memory. If he opens it one way, it instructs him to do automatic writing. If he opens it the other way, it tells him to index quotations from a variety of texts, some real and some fabricated. The book is the fusion of these two types of writing.
DM: What is the significance of the title?
JR: Well, on the literal level, the reader has to presume that the protagonist really has washed ashore on a beach somewhere near here, and really is compiling these notes — in that sense, then, it’s his “imaginary museum” (muses as guardian goddesses of memory), while the Atlantis identification is a fallacy based on his choosing the wrong texts to sample. On a figurative level, the whole thing is a kind of satire on our belief that we can begin again.
DM: Where does he get the texts?
JR: They’re all on the shelves of the girl, Annie, who rescues him from the beach. She lives in a cottage on the coast, and it’s her bookshelf that supplies most of the citations in the encyclopedia part of the book.
DM: Who is Annie?
JR: She’s a composite. I was pursuing a girl called Annie at the time, so I just put her name in and used her as a kind of placeholder, and then never got around to renaming her. I did also have a sister called Anne, though, who seems to me to underlie the character in many ways. In the book itself, she’s very central to the action — such as it is — a kind of compendium of everything that is most magical about the feminine, but also fierce and Dionysian in the final scene where some kind of sacrificial orgy seems to have taken place.
DM: How does the book end?
JR: Well, it doesn’t really, as it is designed to cycle around — there’s no way to be sure which direction is the best one to start in. Physically the narrative portion ends with a kind of bacchanalian ritual by a bonfire during which tales of Atlantis are told and some kind of sacrifice is performed (which is the kind of thing that really does take place in parts of West Auckland) — only hints are given about what Annie is actually holding in her bloodstained hand at the end, though …
DM: Is the Imaginary Museum of Atlantis a real place?
JR: Well, no, by definition it exists only in people’s heads. If it is a real place, I suppose it’s New Zealand: a kind of New World nowhere, which is also everywhere — very specific and very generic at the same time — dominated by European culture, ahistorical, yet also full of its own indigenous history and verities — another version is Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings films. But in terms of the personal reality of the narrator of the novel, his quest is quite desperate — to somehow try to function as a human being without a functioning memory either of his past, or of the new information he takes in — so every deduction he makes is purely on this level of trying to continue to survive as a discrete individual. So, while it has a metaphorical dimension, this primary level of simple need to survive is the primary emotion of the narrative.
DM: The final book is EMO?
JR: Yes. It’s long and strange and was designed to cap off the other two. I didn’t have this idea when I was writing them. They seemed quite self-contained, but when I heard the word EMO for the first time, I saw the possibility of writing something less beleaguered and despairing than the other books. The book is set on Earth, Mars and “Otherwhere” There are three linked novellas: the first is narrated by an android who has been installed with the personality of Eva Braun (or so she believes); the second is set on Mars and involves the machinations of a bunch of characters caught in a kind of suburban intrigue; the third is set on earth again and involves a nurse who has a patient who believes himself to be the poet Ovid, in exile on the shores of the Black Sea.
DM: Where is Otherwhere?
JR: I originally imagined it as a virtual space – like in a computer game. So my Ovid character is living on the Black Sea, and in his house (in Auckland) simultaneously. His virtual environment was engineered by these letters that Ovid wrote home to his friends after he sent into exile by the Emperor Augustus. He was exiled to a tiny village on the black sea, surrounded by barbarians, and he wrote letters asking all his friends not to forget him and telling them about his surroundings. I translate from them in the novella — there are two collections of them: Tristia (Sad Poems) and Epistulae ex Ponto (Letters from Pontus).
DM: And the plot on Mars?
JR: That was the bit that readers had most trouble with. I just wanted to undercut the idea that human beings anywhere would be somehow ennobled by their surroundings. It does get weird, though, with lost races hidden below the surface, pyramids, and references to Edgar Rice Burroughs.
DM: What is the importance of the title?
JR: Well, I guess the title is meant to be quite important. All of the books are designed to dwell on moments of strong emotion which might be defined as “sentimental” in earlier paradigms of art — and when I discovered there was a whole subculture dedicated to such mawkishness, I jumped on it — in all three books the sentimentality is only obvious to close readers, though. The surface impression is of explicit sex, violence and conflict, but those are just there as distractions, really.
DM: You said earlier that EMO is less beleaguered and despairing than the other two novels. How?
JR: I suppose that the other two novels hinge on the failure to make emotional connections with other people (with the respective metaphors of insomnia and amnesia to dramatize this). EMO, on the other hand, shows characters reaching out to one another and achieving some kind of mysterious fusion.

**

The full text of Jack Ross’s Nights with Giordano Bruno is available in electronic form at: http://nightswithgiordanobruno.blogspot.com

Trouble in Mind is available on kindle at https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08C4WLGRV/

The Imaginary Museum of Atlantis is available at: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08GJZ23P9/

The text of EMO can be downloaded from https://mebooks.co.nz/fiction/novels-contemporary/titus-books/emo-ebook

Experimental writings from the pages of the magazine brief are indexed at http://sydreef.blogspot.co.nz/

There’s also a series of online interviews about the trilogy at:

Links to all these, and other texts, can be found on Jack’s blog at http://mairangibay.blogspot.com/



•


(7/10/13)

Apocalypse Confidential: Low Lives, High Strangeness (11/6/21).
[Available at: https://apocalypse-confidential.com/2021/06/11/jack-ross-and-the-imaginary-museum-of-atlantis/]

[2557 wds]


•




Friday

Mezzaluna (2021)





Tracey Slaughter, ed.: Poetry NZ Yearbook 2021 (March 2021)

Reviews:

Michele Leggott


Michele Leggott. Mezzaluna: Selected Poems. Auckland University Press, 2020. RRP $35. 216 pp.




Michele Leggott: Mezzaluna: Selected Poems (2020)


One of my students wrote an essay for our Creative Nonfiction course discussing the use of the senses in the work of two prose writers. The first she discussed, a local blogger and essayist, turned out to rely almost exclusively on visual cues: everything depended on colours, shapes, and things one could see. The second, an international memoirist and cultural commentator, was far more variable in her use of all five senses: touch, taste, sight, scent and hearing — almost (in Sigmund Freud’s phrase) polymorphously perverse in her sensuous appreciation of the world around her. That student was blind.

The relevance of this anecdote to Michele Leggott’s comprehensive selection from more than 30 years of her poetry is not as simple as it might appear. Yes, Michele is blind. Macular degeneration has gradually robbed her of her sight. Yes, she is one of the most acutely sensory of contemporary poets: from her very first book, Like This? (1988), to her latest, Vanishing Points (2017), reviewers and critics have commented on her tendency to restate abstractions in concrete terms.

If there’s a paradox there, it revealed itself early on. When you think of an oeuvre that includes Journey to Portugal (2007), a sumptuous limited edition of poems accompanied by hand-made Gretchen Albrecht collages, as well as a series of books whose shape, size and aesthetic characteristics show an obsessive concern with detail more common to workers in the visual arts, it’s clear that — for Michele — poetry is a thing which transcends any narrow formal definitions of ‘for the page’ or ‘for the voice’. The present book is no exception. If I had to declare a theme in any overview of Michele Leggott’s protean poetic project over the past 30 years, it would be dualities. The North American / New Zealand double focus displayed by the simultaneous publication of her selected poems in both places is nothing new in her work. When she returned to this country in 1985, having completed a doctorate in Canada on the work of American poet Louis Zukofsky, it was apparent at once that she’d imbibed a good deal of his intensely compressed aesthetics in the process. If not a L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E poet, she was at any rate already one whose relation to contemporary poetics as well as poetic practice was intimate and assured.

That first book, Like This?, won a number of awards, not least the International PEN First Book of Poetry award. It was both accessible and scholarly. When I say that her poetry embraces dualities, it’s important to stress that I don’t mean dichotomies: it’s never either/or in Michele’s work — always both/and.

The first and most irritating label her creative work to date has had to endure is ‘academic poetry’. Those of us who happen to work in the tertiary-education industry — in this country, at any rate — have to get used to complaints about living in ‘ivory towers’ and a supposed preoccupation with poetics over everyday life, style over substance, experimentation over mainstream accessibility . . .The only real answer to such accusations is the quality and durability of the work in question. Michele’s poetry has always seemed to me to constitute the perfect answer to this particular bugbear.

Her third book, DIA, succeeded in combining her academic interests in recuperating the voices of neglected local women writers with the formalist techniques she’d picked up from a battery of writers, local and international, Zukofsky, Ian Wedde, Susan Howe, and a host of others. The result was a tour-de-force of stunning visual design combined with sensuous imagery — the kissing lips of ‘Micromelismata’ being the most famous of many examples. There were so many levels on which one could read these poems that they almost defied criticism. Above all, though, there’s nothing particularly ‘ivory tower’ about pointing out examples of gender discrimination past and present.

The flexible instrument of Michele’s intellectual interest in such ‘lost voices’ — whether they belonged to Ursula Bethell, Eileen Duggan, Iris Guiver Wilkinson (Robin Hyde), or (more recently) Alan Brunton and Emily Harris — has informed her poetry ever since, but also resulted in a series of essays and editions of their work which have assisted in rewriting the map of New Zealand letters.

As the first National Library-appointed New Zealand Poet Laureate from 2008 to 2009, Michele started to compose a series of poems meant more for the ear than the eye — collected in Mirabile Dictu (2009) and Heartland (2014): both well sampled from in the present volume. Once again, though, she confounded expectations of more in the same vein with her latest book Vanishing Points, a collection of prose poems and lineated pieces designed to engage more systematically than ever before with history itself: her own, as in her alternate-past piece about her mother’s painting career, ‘Self-Portrait: Still Life. A Family Story’ (alas, not included here), and New Zealand’s, in ‘The Fascicles’ and ‘Emily and Her Sisters’ (both included in full).

The very last poem in the book, a hitherto uncollected piece called ‘the wedding party’ (first published in Poetry New Zealand Yearbook 2019) continues this theme with its imagery drawn from the Taranaki war of the 1860s, and its effortless shifting from Māori to English to Latin (intentionally garbled for safe transmission by government spies).

Thirty years on, Michele Leggott’s work continues to give ‘academic writing’ a good name. Why not read a poet so attentive to sources; to the sound and texture of the past; to the sensuous realities of beach, sun, sand which are our heritage in these islands; to the aesthetic patterning as well as the careful sounding out of words; to the dark which we come from — and return to — and the light which we try to shed while we’re here? I can’t think of a good reason. Can you?



•


Original text:

Like This?


Michele Leggott. Mezzaluna: Selected Poems. ISBN 978-0-8195-7907-2. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 2020. RRP $US18.95. 216 pp.

Michele Leggott. Mezzaluna: Selected Poems. ISBN 9-781-86940-907-4. Auckland: Auckland University Press, 2020. RRP $NZ 35. 216 pp.




Michele Leggott: Mezzaluna: Selected Poems (2020)


One of my students wrote an essay discussing the use of the senses in the work of two prose writers for our Creative Nonfiction course here at Massey. The first she discussed, a local blogger and essayist, turned out to rely almost exclusively on visual cues: everything depended on colours, shapes, and things one could see. The second, an international memoirist and cultural commentator, was far more variable in her use of all five senses: touch, taste, sight, scent, and hearing – almost (in Sigmund Freud’s phrase) polymorphously perverse in her sensuous appreciation of the world around her.

That student was blind.

The relevance of this anecdote to Michele Leggott’s comprehensive selection from more than thirty years of her poetry is not as simple as it might appear. Yes, Michele is blind. Macular degeneration has gradually robbed her of her sight over a period of decades. Yes, she is one of the most acutely sensory of contemporary poets: from her very first book, Like This? (1988) to her latest, Vanishing Points (2017) reviewers and critics have commented on her tendency to restate abstractions in concrete terms.

I recall an old essay of Michele’s on Robert Duncan where she began by remarking how the recurrence of a certain term in his poems which sounded a bit like the name of the dog next door made the latter come barking up to the fence on a regular basis throughout the summer – rather like the repetition of the word ‘caddy’ which attracts poor Benjy Compson to the fence of a neighbouring golf-course, thus prompting the long reverie about his lost sister Caddie which opens William Faulkner’s Sound and the Fury.

If there’s a paradox there, it revealed itself early on. When you think of an oeuvre which includes a sumptuous limited edition of poems accompanied by hand-made Gretchen Albrecht collages, Journey to Portugal (2007), as well as a series of books whose shape, size, and aesthetic characteristics show an obsessive concern with detail more common to workers in the visual arts, it’s clear that – for Michele – poetry is a thing which transcends any narrow formal definitions of ‘for the page’ or ‘for the voice.’

The present book is no exception. I happen to be privileged to own copies of both the American and New Zealand editions of Mezzaluna. Strange to say, given they have the same pagination and essential layout, the two books look quite different. The American edition uses thistledown to divide up the various sections, as well as adorning the front cover. The New Zealand edition uses long meandering riverine shapes to achieve the same object.

I guess if I had to declare a theme in any overview I’d care to provide of Michele Leggott’s protean poetic project over the past thirty years, it would be dualities. This North American / New Zealand double focus is nothing new in her work. When she returned to this country in 1985, having completed a Doctorate in Canada on the work of American poet Louis Zukofsky, it was apparent at once that she’d imbibed a good deal of his intensely compressed aesthetics in the process. If not a L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E poet, she was at any rate already one whose relation to contemporary poetics as well as poetic practice was intimate and assured.

That first book, Like This?, won a number of awards, not least the International PEN First Book of Poetry award. More to the point, it was both accessible and scholarly. When I say that her poetry embraces dualities, it’s important to stress that I don’t mean dichotomies: it’s never either/or in Michele’s work – always both/and.

I suppose the first and most irritating label her creative work to date has had to endure is ‘Academic poetry.’ Those of us who happen to work in the tertiary education industry – in this country, at any rate – have to get used to complaints about living in ‘Ivory Towers’ and a supposed preoccupation with poetics over everyday life, style over substance, experimentation over mainstream accessibility …

The only real answer to such accusations – which can admittedly have a certain validity at times – is the quality and durability of the work in question. Michele’s poetry has always seemed to me to constitute the perfect answer to this particular bugbear.

Her third book, DIA, succeeded in combining her Academic interests in recuperating the voices of neglected local women writers with the formalist techniques she’d picked up from a battery of writers, local and international, Zukofsky, Ian Wedde, Susan Howe, and a host of others. The result was a tour-de-force of stunning visual design combined with sensuous imagery – the kissing lips of ‘Micromelismata’ being the most famous of many examples. There were so many levels on which one could read these poems, that they almost defied criticism. Above all, though, there’s nothing particularly ‘Ivory Tower’ about pointing out examples of gender discrimination past and present.

The flexible instrument of Michele’s intellectual interest in such ‘lost voices’ – whether they belonged to Ursula Bethell, Eileen Duggan, Iris Guiver Wilkinson [Robin Hyde], or (more recently) Alan Brunton and Emily Harris – has informed her poetry ever since, but also resulted in a series of essays and editions of their work which have assisted in rewriting the map of New Zealand letters.

As the first National Library-appointed NZ Poet Laureate from 2008-9, Michele started to compose a series of poems meant more for the ear than the eye – collected in Mirabile Dictu (2009) and Heartland (2014): both well sampled from in the present volume. Once again, though, she confounded expectations of more in the same vein with her latest book Vanishing Points, a collection of prose poems and lineated pieces designed to engage more systematically than ever before with history itself: her own, as in her alternate-past piece about her mother’s painting career, ‘Self-Portrait: Still Life. A Family Story’ (alas, not included here), and New Zealand’s, in ‘The Fascicles’ and ‘Emily and Her Sisters’ (both included in full).

The very last poem in the book, a hitherto uncollected piece called ‘the wedding party’ (first published in Poetry NZ Yearbook 2019) continues this theme with its imagery drawn from the Taranaki war of the 1860s, and its effortless shifting from Māori to English to Latin (intentionally garbled for safe transmission by Government spies).

Thirty years on, Michele Leggott’s work continues to give ‘Academic writing’ a good name. Why not read a poet so attentive to sources; to the sound and texture of the past; to the sensuous realities of beach, sun, sand which are our heritage in these islands; to the aesthetic patterning as well as the careful sounding out of words; to the dark which we come from – and return to – and the light which we try to shed while we’re here?

I can’t think of a good reason. Can you?

[1172 wds]



•


(25-29/8/20)

Poetry New Zealand Yearbook 2021. ISBN 978-0-9951354-2-0 (March 2021): 352-54.

[997 wds]


Michele Leggott & Olive (2011)


•