Showing posts with label David Gregory. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Gregory. Show all posts

Sunday

Land very Fertile (2009)


Jack Ross, ed.: Poetry NZ 38 (March 2009)


Coral Atkinson & David Gregory, ed. Land very Fertile: Banks Peninsula in Poetry & Prose. ISBN 978-1-877257-75-9. Christchurch: CUP, 2008.



Coral Atkinson & David Gregory, ed.: Land very Fertile (2008)


This is an excellent (and long overdue) idea for an anthology, I think we’d all agree. Banks Peninsula with its majestic harbour, mysterious ring of coastal valleys, and rich history of French and other European colonisation clearly deserves celebration, and it’s particularly encouraging that Canterbury University Press felt able to issue the book in such sumptuous style – with colour photographs on good quality paper. The contents are an eclectic mix, from the classic (Bethell and Baxter) to the more contemporary (Fiona Farrell and Rangi Faith). Best of all, it’s just the right size to take with you on a long leisurely walk or drive around the area.

(12/08)

Poetry NZ 38 (2009): 107-8.

[128 wds]

Poetry NZ 38 (2009)


•




Thursday

Imaginary Toads: V – David Gregory (2001)


David Howard, ed.: Complete with Instructions (2001)

V – A Conversation with David Gregory

A part of the amusement they yielded came, I daresay, from my exaggerating them – grouping them into a larger mystery (and thereby a larger ‘law’) than the facts, as observed, yet warranted; but that is the common fault of minds for whom the vision of life is an obsession. The obsession pays, if one will; but to pay it has to borrow.
– Henry James



Born and brought up in England, David Gregory emigrated to New Zealand 16 years ago. He works as a Coastal Planner for the Canterbury Regional Council. Co-founder of Sudden Valley Press, and a well-known poetry organiser in Christchurch, he has published two collections to date:
  • Always Arriving. Christchurch: Sudden Valley Press, 1997.
  • frame of mind. Christchurch: Sudden Valley Press, 1997.

How would you sum up Christchurch as a place?

Of the cities I’ve lived in, or been familiar with, it’s the one I’ve been able to encompass in my head. I had a certain experience of the plains early on when I arrived here. It’s not a landscape in the British sense – more like a landscape evolving, a land-form in transition, not yet emerging as an artefact. I guess that to a lot of New Zealanders the plains seem intolerably ordered, but not to me. I love the mountains because of their escape from order – you can pass from this dry side to subtropical rain-forest. I think it’s still possible to write about the landscape here without being too trite, too forced – the weather patterns, the Alps and the Port Hills behind you. On a clear winter’s day the Alps hurl themselves across the plain towards you. I’ve written quite a lot about the way that words can destroy the solitude, so that silence becomes a sort of rare species …

He went on to talk about a poem he had written about the different ways souls turn here – anticlockwise, like water going down a drain:
Yang of the South;
a Janus direction
where civilization thins
with rising altitude, speech
and welcome smiles
obvious on thin air …

I lean upon the wind.
The souls move anti-clockwise.

Had you written much before you came out here?

A scattering – but I used the opportunity of coming here to emerge as another person. When you emigrate you can die in one place and be reborn in the other. I told myself ‘I am going to be more disciplined from now on.’ That was sixteen years ago.

So you reinvented yourself as a writer? Do you consider yourself an English writer, or a New Zealand one?

I don’t feel colonised by any particular usage. What I write has been enriched and informed by being in New Zealand; the landscape certainly enters into it, too. I feel I have a distinctive enough voice now not to need to invent a vernacular of Kiwi speech, though I have played around with it. Those poems now seem a bit forced and unnatural to me.

Why does poetry still seem such an élitist and distanced thing to so many people?

Recently I gave a presentation to a Sixth Form class. I really wanted to engage them, so my first question was: ‘Who’s listened to any poetry at home in the last week?’ One person put up their hand. I then read out some lines from current hits – the Smashing Pumpkins, then Bob Dylan and some others. ‘Is that poetry?’ they asked. After that, they all put their hands up. Not only did they listen to poetry, they were eating it like McDonalds.

The appetite for language has to be filled. Is it that we’re only providing caviar?

Perhaps it’s too restricting in its devices. A lot of those young people would avidly read the sleeves of CDs. It wasn’t that they lacked the ability to see what the words were getting at. When I was at the writers week in Dunedin, I sat through a poetry performance at the Town Hall where there seemed to be compulsory attendance for schools. The performance poets – Cilla McQueen, Bub Bridger, David Eggleton – went down well, but when one of our more prominent academic poets (I won’t say who) came on, the young guy in front of me leant over to his female companion and said, ‘This sucks.’ I don’t mean that we should dumb down poetry, but maybe try for the right level to get people interested.

Together with John O’Connor, David is one of the organisers of the poetry readings run by the Canterbury Poets’ Collective.

There certainly is a problematic relation between poetry that works on the page and poetry which works – or entertains – in performance.

And you can see it in our readings. A lot of poets’ delivery is appalling. But we’ve been astonished at the level of attendance. We’ve had up to sixty or seventy people, and we’ve averaged forty or fifty. I have to say that John has been vital in that – his sheepdog approach to people, the way he has of going up to them and nipping their heels really keeps them going. And there are really marvellous new poets coming forward now. The trouble is, every time someone praises us for the job we’re doing, we feel like asking ‘How about you doing some?’

But basically, you would say that poetry is alive in Christchurch?

Yeah, the patient is doing remarkably well.


(2/2/98)

Complete with Instructions. Edited by David Howard. ISBN 0-473-07646-2 (Christchurch: Firebrand, 2001): 44-46.

[1171 wds]


Complete with Instructions (2001)


•




Tuesday

Sudden Valley Press (1998)



Pander 4 (Winter 1998)


David Gregory. Always Arriving. Christchurch: Sudden Valley Press, 1997; Helen Jacobs. Pools over Stone. Christchurch: SVP, 1997; John O’Connor. As It Is: Poems 1981-1996. Christchurch: SVP, 1997.



David Gregory: Always Arriving (1997)


These are the first fruits of the Sudden Valley Press. It isn’t really fair to review them together, as they are three very different poets (a fact somewhat obscured by the similarities in design and format), but it does seem worthwhile to discuss the implications of their appearance before going into the question of their individual merits.

The major publishers of poetry in New Zealand at present are two university presses: Auckland and Victoria. Caxton Press no longer publishes poetry, and Oxford has virtually ceased to do so. There are still various small publishers who specialise in it, or who maintain a list: ranging from the full-fledged commercial operations of Christchurch’s Hazard Press to small-scale providers such as Auckland’s Pohutukawa Press.

Put bluntly, publishing poetry doesn’t pay. Even really big names can still make a loss on their books, and an unknown poet is seldom a worthwhile bet even if their work is truly exceptional. Unless, that is, there are extraneous factors which may contribute to selling it. In most of these firms, the influence of the publicity department has long outweighed the editorial staff.



John O'Connor: As It Is (1997)


Two poets in Christchurch, John O’Connor and David Gregory, have now set up their own publishing house, which offers to publish suitable manuscripts at a reasonable cost, providing authors undertake to help with the distribution and publicising of their work. As well as the three books included in this review, the opening salvo from Sudden Valley Press included works by John Allison and Bernard Gadd. Another group is promised for later this year.

The moment had certainly come. I think we can all see that commercial publishing is no longer – if it ever did – serving the interests of poetry readers in New Zealand, and it is no real solution for authors to print and distribute their own work with no editorial input whatsoever. Sudden Valley Press offers a useful compromise between the two, and an example which might be usefully taken up elsewhere in the country.

By their fruits ye shall judge them, though. Taking them in alphabetical order, the British poet David Gregory’s Always Arriving contains an uneven, but deceptively original set of poems grouped around the theme of emigrating to this country. Too often he is betrayed by his adjectives: meniscus window (32), Iliad olives (34), vampire sky (36), and – worst of all – Bloody Mary sun (76). It’s a shame, because this occasional tendency to overwrite and over-determine his effects masks a true talent for simplicity:
a smile
and the children
asking to go
down to the fair.
(“Upon the Revision of Opinion Concerning Thomas Hardy”)

Again it rains.
I go out
to catch you falling.
(“During Your Absence”)

The latter poem is what I mean by “deceptively original.” The implications of its echoes of telephone answering machines are interesting to ponder, and by no means easy to solve. “Time Lapse” is another particularly striking poem in this respect. It seems obvious but isn’t quite.

John O’Connor is “an unabashed admirer of Denis Glover, [who] believes that Christchurch is as good a place as any from which to write poetry.” So his blurb claims, at any rate. One might be forgiven for not noticing, if one were confined purely to the contents of his book. I mean that as a compliment.

Whatever he may have been in early incarnations (there is an ominous note to that self-description as “verse satirist,” also on the blurb), he seems now to be preoccupied with questions of form: there are Poundian word-arrangements, open-form poems, two– and three-line stanzas, single blocks of poem – normally grouped closely together. Sometimes their titles let them down: “Gambit,” “Centenary, for Two,” “Flower” (at any moment one expects to find: “My Vase”), but the slight sense of uneasiness which he is so adept at creating steals gradually upon one. Take “Text, Subtext,” for example:
The light behind their faces —
by it
you know it’s winter

& you’d rather be walking the rocky track
past the flowering bush
its purple quietly vibrating

until then you hadn’t noticed the chill
their questions
do not require answers

John O’Connor’s is a haunted, edgy world, where your party card is always being scrutinised, and the question “do you / ever dream in colour?” has become a threat. His verse is, in fact, the opposite of robust Glover manliness. Its potency rises from self-doubt, from a refusal to be smug.

I fear that I have less that is useful to say about Helen Jacobs, which is not really fair. This is her third collection of poetry, and it is clear that she has a highly-developed lyric gift:
Somehow the images always tie into a line,
a kite dipping and making deaf talk
at the end of reason.
(“Day Moon and Wind”)

The trouble, for me, is that the images always do tie into a line. They’re beautifully put, they rearrange themselves in myriad forms, but they end up in reason. Even a poem like “In the Manner of Unframing,” which seems to be questioning its own syntax, the mode of its own composition, ends up somehow contained by “the pink and dry carapace / at our feet.”

I had a marvellous moment when I turned the page from “Landing with Rocks” (with its somewhat redundant subheading – Wellington Airport -), to find that that final-sounding “imprint of rock” had modulated into “honey for the ants.” Now that is bizarre, I thought – striking, dislocating, a new view of the capital. Alas, the latter page was simply a new poem without a title, and the ants were ants, not startled citizens fleeing the wheels of a descending Boeing.



Helen Jacobs: Pools over Stone (1997)



(5/98)

Pander 4 (1998): 14.

[963 wds]


Pander 4 (1998)


•