Showing posts with label Stu Bagby. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stu Bagby. Show all posts

Saturday

Just Another Fantastic Anthology (2009)


Jack Ross, ed.: Poetry NZ 38 (March 2009)


Stu Bagby, ed. Just Another Fantastic Anthology: Auckland in Poetry. ISBN 978-0-473-13767-0. Auckland: Antediluvian Press, 2008. RRP $29.00.



The JAFA gag is a good one, I think. “Just Another Funloving Aucklander,” as one of our ex- mayors put it. “I have not set out to panegyrize the city,” claims Stu Bagby in his Editor’s Note. “Zig-zagging the isthmus from east to west, this is a ‘fantastic’ portage in the sense of some of the less commonly used meanings of that word.” That is indeed the strength of Bagby’s book: the proliferating variety of its ‘fantastic’ imaginative worlds, from Sam Hunt’s “flesh-coloured” Castor Bay to Karlo Mila’s “iridescent / trickster / of a city.” Bagby himself acknowledges “that I’ve travelled with the baggage of my gender, cultural background, experiences and age,” but then the same proviso would apply to any other anthologist. A more complete cross-section of approaches and styles might risk dissolving into cacophony.


(12/08)

Poetry NZ 38 (2009): 107-8.

[155 wds]

Poetry NZ 38 (2009)






Monday

Climbing off the Barricades (2008)






Brett Cross & Bill Direen, ed.: brief 36 - The NZ Music Issue (September 2008)

Climbing off the Barricades


Tony Beyer, Dream Boat: Selected Poems. ISBN 978-0-473-12652-0. Wellington: HeadworX, 2007. RRP $34.99.

A Good Handful: Great New Zealand Poems about Sex. Ed. Stu Bagby. ISBN 978-1-86940-403-1. Auckland: Auckland University Press, 2008. RRP $27.99.



Tony Beyer: Dream Boat: Selected Poems (2007)


Looking back over the HeadworX poetry list ten years (and 39 books) after its inception in 1998, it seems to me that some of the best books on it are the substantial single-author collections Mark Pirie has put out.

Riemke Ensing’s Talking Pictures (2000), Lewis Scott’s Earth Colours (2000), Stephen Oliver’s Night of Warehouses (2001) and Michael O’Leary’s Toku Tinihanga (Self Deception) (2003) were all substantial selections from poets with long, complex back-catalogues. Simon Williamson’s Storyteller (2002) was a memorial volume for a promising young poet who hadn’t yet published widely, but who had a strong following on the Wellington live poetry scene.

There’s clearly a lot of editorial work involved in such projects – far more than for more conventional slim volumes of verse or even (quite possibly), anthologies. Perhaps that’s why there’ve been fewer of them in recent years. I was therefore very happy to see that Tony Beyer had joined the ranks of the HeadworX selected poets with this book, Dream Poems, a substantial sampling from almost forty years of work.

One presumes the arrangement of the poems is roughly chronological, despite their being arranged in one long sequence. Unlike previous volumes in this series, they aren’t grouped under the titles of the books they came out in, ranging from Jesus Hobo (Dunedin: Caveman Press, 1971) to Electric Yachts (Auckland: Puriri Press, 2003). It doesn’t really seem to matter much, though – one of the distinguishing features of Beyer’s poetry is its consistency. Times have changed and fashions shifted, but the essential Beyer poem: free verse, casual and understated vernacular language, left-margin justified irregular stanzas, remains much as it always was.

On the one hand, this shows an independent determination to go his own way, despite what others were doing – one reason, perhaps, for the neglect his poetry has often suffered beside his more showy contemporaries. On the other hand, it means that there are few surprises and shocks as one turns the pages. A quiet reflectiveness is Beyer’s characteristic tone. He seldom raises his voice, and one must tune in carefully to hear what he has to say.

Take “Days of 1968,” for instance (p.188):
while streets of paris burned again
& (nostalgic ampersand)
the poetry revolution was taking shape
in Melbourne and Sydney
and the word was about to be Freed
at the university I’d dropped out of
I had a job driving cattle with an electric prod
up duralumin sided ramps to their death
and nutritious dismemberment

That’s an awful lot to load into one stanza! The nostalgia for Creeley-esque ampersands and abbreviations, coupled with the Paris barricades, Brunton and his cohorts starting Freed (at “the university I’d dropped out of”), while our narrator faces an even deeper level of the military-industrial killing machine. There’s some Baxter-esque self-congratulation there, no doubt: I dropped out, while you guys stayed in the institution and theorised – however, it takes the form more of gentle scepticism than a burning passion of repudiation. Even the poor dead cows are, after all, quite “nutritious,” post-dismemberment.

The poem continues with more juxtapositions of the public and personal:
the Wahine foundered
Martin Luther King and the second Kennedy were shot
I was in love with Baudelaire and Rimbaud
and Guillaume Apollinaire in whose honour
I shunned punctuation for years

That last is rather a nice touch. I’ve looked in vain through the whole of this book for any punctuation. Guillaume Apollinaire is still, it would appear, in the ascendant, which might prompt us to see a gentle, deflating irony in the rest of the poem also:
instead of achieving literary prominence
I’d fallen for the woman who is still with me
and was none the worse for it

Climb down off your stilts, the poet appears to be saying. Stop following those adolescent dreams of revolution and transcendence. The movement you seek is on your shoulder (to quote Paul McCartney). Above all, give up Romantic passion and work on your relationship instead … a nice (and rather welcome) antidote to Yeats’s “Why should not old men be mad?”

And yet, the second verse obtrudes a curious, eldritch atmosphere of doubt into this somewhat deflating scenario:
one day the slouch hat I wore in the rain
… touched the bare 9-volt wire
the prodders were juiced off
surrounding my head
with a halo of purple flame

A poetic halo? The divine afflatus? Or – given that the wires were powered by the killing tools of his craft – the return of the repressed? I like it. I like the poem and I like the book it comes from. I’d like to examine more of Beyer’s poems in details – point out the fine, unobtrusive craft with which he operates: the high percentage of hits, page after page, achieved without fanfare or vainglory. But this one example will have to suffice.

On the evidence of this book, I personally probably have a higher tolerance for fireworks and high-wire work than Beyer (one must be honest even about one’s prejudices), but I’m very pleased that he’s had his say at last. Congratulations both to the poet and his publisher on this fine book, which will, I suspect, outlast most of the far more intensively-hyped poetry releases this year.


Coupling Tony Beyer and Stu Bagby (it’s very hard to avoid unfortunate double entendres when talking about sex, or even about collections of poems about sex) is perhaps less anomalous than it seems.

I confess that my heart sank when I heard about this project. The title, “A good handful” seemed just a bit too much of an obeisance to the nudge-nudge, wink-wink tendencies of Kiwi backroom culture, and the claim that 69 poems (or was it poets?) were to be included didn’t greatly reassure me either.

And yet – there really are an awful lot of poems about sex, or which touch upon it in some way. Let’s face it, it’s on our minds; and it certainly isn’t only male poets who go on about it.

That in itself doesn’t guarantee a good anthology, of course, but one thing about Stu Bagby is that when he takes up a subject he really thinks it through.

If you’re looking for a really sexy book, this isn’t it. There’s no real pornography here, though there are certainly some saucy poems. The more I read in it, though, the more impressed I was by the delicacy and tact with which Stu had negotiated these deep and perplexing waters.

“Sex had a lot to do with it,” the Smithyman quote with which he leads off his preface, does (as Stu says) remain “true of both poetry and life.” Before I read this book I wasn’t sure that such an anthology could be compiled without fatal compromises on some level or other. I admit it. I was wrong. This isn’t just a pillow-book for courting couples. I think anyone could read it with pleasure and profit.

Let’s finish, then, with a few samples, giving an idea of the collection’s range and scope:
[on a penis]:
see how the shy creature stirs
and lifts – feels the way
with its sensitive tip:
seems to pause
like any timid thing
that tests the level of trust,
then eager, nudging,
nuzzles closer,
hungry as a suckling pup.

– Emma Neale, “The Artist’s Model’s Reply” (p.69)

[on a femme fatale]:
I am da dog kirl wif da fire in my arse
Dey call me da woman not da kirl
My thighs rub together make da fire in deir house
My fat taro legs my fat taro belly my fat taro susu
I walk past all da good womens
An laugh wif my white teef flashing.

– Tusiata Avia, “Pa‘u-stina” (p.53)

[on caution]:
Erring on the side of caution is
a taxi home in summer, money
kept in a shoe. It’s a condom worn
from a thousand pocketings, a watch
set fast, a glove with your name in it.

– Kate Camp, “Erring” (p.84)

[on sex itself]:
On the wall above the bedside lamp
a large crane-fly is jump-starting
a smaller crane-fly – or vice versa.
They do it tail to tail, like Volkswagens:
their engines must be in their rears.

It looks easy enough. Let’s try it.

– Fleur Adcock, “Coupling” (p.1)

Maybe there’s something to be said for restraint and subtlety, after all. Beyer and Bagby, in their very different ways, make a pretty strong case for it.


(8/4/08)

brief 36 (2008): 114-18.

[1431 wds]

brief 36 (2008)






Friday

Here After: Living with Bereavement (2000)


Jack Ross, ed.: Spin 36 (March 2000)


Here After. Living with Bereavement: Personal Experiences and Poetry, edited by Stu Bagby. Antediluvian Press, 9 Daphne Harden Lane, Albany, Auckland, 2000. ISBN 0-473-06399-9. 104pp. $19.95.



Styu Bagby, ed.: Here After (2000)


This is an anthology of personal testimonies and poems about the experience of bereavement. Stu Bagby, a well-known poet who doubles as a cemetery assistant on Auckland’s North Shore, hopes (as he remarks in the preface) that it “will provide solace and encouragement to some, and confirm the validity of life being lived, and of lives now past.” There’s a certain amount of aesthetic distancing in some of the extracts: well-known pieces by Elizabeth Smither (“A Cortège of Daughters”), Vincent O’Sullivan (two poems from Brother Jonathan, Brother Kafka), and Lauris Edmond (herself now, alas, gone to the shades). Others are heartbreakingly – if at times clumsily – real. Like the bereavement column at the back of the newspaper, they exert a somehow extra-literary power. The justification for the book is primarily pragmatic, then. It aims to help out, as well as providing some appropriate texts for meditation or reading aloud. It fulfils both these purposes very well, though I have to confess that I found parts of it almost too painful to read.


(2/2000)

Spin 36 (2000): 60.

[197 wds]

Spin 36 (2000)






Sunday

Anne (2000)


Stu Bagby, ed.: Here After (2000)

Jack



Anne Ross: "Egyptian Girl" (c.1975)


Before I picked up the receiver, I knew what the phone-call was about.

I’m not saying that it was a genuine premonition, though such things do run in my family. I think it was more of an expectation. The last time I’d spoken to her, on the phone, a few days before, she’d sounded remarkably bright and cheerful – not, in this case, the most encouraging of signs.

“Anne’s dead,” said my mother’s voice. “She killed herself last night, with pills. We found her this morning. We still have got no idea where she got them from.”

I said some things, I suppose. I don’t remember what. The hardest thing was trying to sound surprised, because (after all) I already knew she was dead. My mind seemed to be outside all this, somehow, looking in and judging the correctness of my reactions in a cold, analytical way.

It was a Thursday, I think (in fact, I know it was, because I just looked it up in my diary). Before that, the first thing I wrote was: “It must have been a Friday” – it feels like a Friday, in retrospect.

The funeral, I was told, was already fixed for that weekend, for Saturday (I wrote “Sunday” first, but again my first memory was wrong). Already fixed. I remember that, because it seemed too business-like for the very day of her death. I said that we would fly up for it, probably next day, after my classes were over. It’s funny how obtrusive practical considerations can become at such a time.

Then I put the phone down. What does one do next?

It was mid-morning. I was sitting in my little bare office, in an old pre-fab, away off on the edge of the playing-fields of Massey University at Palmerston North. I had a class later that afternoon, and would have to wait for that.

The first thing I did was go for a walk. There was a wooded area down by the gate, and I strode up and down through it for half an hour or so. From time to time I stopped and scribbled words on a pad: raw, disjointed comments about the tragedy of my sister’s life, her death. She’d told my mother many times that she didn’t want to reach thirty the way she was – and her birthday would have been in a few weeks. For more than ten years she’d been caught in a cycle of clinical depression, agoraphobia, despair shading off into insanity. There was no name for what was wrong with her, so they called it “personality disorder.” My sister was beautiful, brilliant, compassionate; skeletons used to crawl out of her cupboard to tell her she was going to hell.

Cheap, cheap, cheap. You can’t summarise ten years of suffering, of gradually escalating disintegration like that. I’d seen of it only what she wanted me to see. She was an expert at projecting façades. My mother had borne the brunt of it, all those years, long conversations every night, screaming – bouts of literal madness. They’d tried every kind of anti-depressant drug, change of scene, prayer, counselling …

I felt shell-shocked. I wanted to, but wasn’t able to cry. The phrases I was writing began to turn into lines, and I found I was writing a poem. It can be a distraction at such a time, worrying about the placement of words, images. I called it “Elegy for Ames” (her nickname as a child):
Renounce the defective drum,
the curtain of incoherences;
no longer lie alone
and lost, in fear, defenceless.

The heat of the Bay no more
will thunder in from above.
no need to bolt the door
against ineffectual love.

Kind Katies’ bargain sales
no longer will stock your shelves;
no more Koala tales
pursue divergent selves.

I look into the eyes
of the Egyptian girl
hanging upon my wall;
funny, they seem the same:
delicate, poised to fall,
with an eternal gaze.




In my photograph album there are two pictures. One shows the morning of the funeral. I’m standing, dressed in black, with my (then) wife Jackie-Anne. Our faces are drawn and fixed; we stand as stiff as ramrods, staring into the camera. The second shows us walking on Long Bay beach that afternoon, in old jumpers and slacks, hugging each other, comfortable and smiling in the late Autumn sunshine.

So marked is the contrast that they seem almost posed, designed. Looking at them, I glimpse the time between, the funeral – that clumsy, formal, externalised version of our grief.

It began, I remember, with milling around the door of the chapel, getting ready to carry the coffin in. It wasn’t very heavy, but smooth wood: awkward to hold, and hard on the shoulder. It seemed bizarre, unreal – like carrying furniture, or a heavy crate.

My mother had asked her favourite pastor to come and preach, which he agreed to do despite the fact that he couldn’t “sanction” suicide. The rest of us – my father, Jackie-Anne and I (my two brothers were overseas and unable to come) – hadn’t particularly cared who spoke. The sermon, though, was so irrelevant, such a tissue of scriptural references without a single mention of my sister that I felt a surge of rage.

In retrospect, it was a useful distraction. I wasn’t up to speaking myself, but my poem was read out by a booming-voiced churchman who didn’t understand it. The references, it is true, were private: the “koala games” we used to play as children, the “Egyptian girl” symbolic of the many beautiful pastel portraits she drew (and sold: her art was quite professional and finished), but I’d hoped that something in it might come across.

At the end, though, as I filed out with the other people, I suddenly understood that I’d never see my sister again. She was in that box, and I hadn’t really said goodbye, and now we were leaving her behind. That last detail was the catch. I started to cry.

I cried in Jackie-Anne’s arms – loud sobs, no polite sniffling. It was hysterical, uncontrollable. I shook and moaned and hid my face from everyone. My cousin Hugh came over too and put his arms around me. We’ve never spoken of it since, but I’ll always respect him for trying to help me then, however ineffectual it may have seemed.

After a while it stopped. We all drove back to the house. We had to do something, though, to get our minds off it. Hence the walk on Long Bay Beach.

I’d known all along that I had to cry, express my feelings somehow, but that isn’t always so easy. I felt much better for it, though – better for having lost control. It was my sister’s life I felt angry about, not her death. I wonder, even, if we too readily accepted her suicide, understood the reasons that drove her to it?

I was crying for me, though, not for her. I loved her, and I didn’t want to leave her behind in that horrible big empty room. I remember the two of us as children, how protective she had been of me. Once, when we were both very young, in the primers at school, after trying in vain to ascertain why I was so terribly upset, she led me up to one of the more sympathetic teachers, explaining earnestly: “He’s crying, but he doesn’t know why.” She always wanted to help.

We talk about her less and less in my family, but I have three of her pictures on my wall, and a snapshot on my desk. I look at them every day. She’s not dead in my mind, and she never will be.

For years afterwards I would think of things – jokes, comic-book references – which would have made sense only to her. But that started to die down eventually. I’m determined, though, never to allow her to become taboo, unmentionable.

And that’s why I’m writing this, on a windy evening, looking out over the green-grey waves of Okahu Bay. Memories, it is true, can be lost once one sets them down in black and white – it’s something to do with the process of editorialising, tidying them up. But it’s been seven years, and other things have happened in the meantime, and if I want to record it clearly, the time is now.

To be honest, though, I never would have done it if I hadn’t been asked to. The funeral helped me, provoking grief in that painful way. I don’t have any other advice or counsel to give, except to let sorrow come in its own time, and not to worry if your feelings don’t fit what other people describe, or seem to be expecting of you.

The thing that got me most was leaving her behind in that wood box. I wanted her to be able to get up, to come with us. Why should my sister be the only one left there as the rest of us filed out to continue with our day?



(8-11/10/98)

Here After. Living with Bereavement: Personal Experiences and Poetry. Edited by Stu Bagby. Auckland: Antediluvian Press, 2000. 35-40.

[1508 wds]


Stu Bagby, ed.: Here After (2000)